> The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.
As promised, here are some results from me, now that I got some half-
decent spam throughput. Not an ISP, not a company. Have been running the
original cf for 5 days, then updated. Since then another 5 days passed.
8.7% hits in spa
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.
>
> As promised, here are some results from me, now that I got some half-
> decent spam throughput. Not an ISP, not a company. Have been running the
> original cf fo
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 07:06 +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> Thanks. And this is just a small scale test. If we used more domains, feeds,
> and submissions, it could be even nicer. ;-) Keep the reports coming in. It
> would be nice to also know how much of spam are generally from freemails, so
> FREEMAIL_
On 5/22/09 at 9:28 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam
>scoring < 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1]
>spam. This is rare to find...
My EMAILBL_TEST_LEM hitrate leans heavily toward the other end of the
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:26 -0500, Larry Nedry wrote:
> On 5/22/09 at 9:28 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam
> >scoring < 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1]
> >spam. This is rare to find...
>
> My
Sorry, quoting self.
> > > An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam
> > > scoring < 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1]
> > > spam. This is rare to find...
> That's limited to EmailBL hits, so the total of these hits equal 100%.
> For me that
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> > The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.
[snip]
> Thanks. And this is just a small scale test. If we used more domains, feeds,
> and submissions, it cou
btw guys, note that hit-frequencies can also produce rule-overlap reports using
the "-o" switch
--j.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 00:57, Mandy wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Henrik K wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>>> > The EmailBL test