On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Baron wrote:
> > > /etc/rc0.d/S35networking
> > > /etc/rc6.d/S35networking
> > > /etc/rcS.d/S40networking
> >
> > Is not the final run level 5.
>
> The default runlevel is 2 in Debian. Unless otherwise modified all
> run levels have the sa
David Baron wrote:
> > /etc/rc0.d/S35networking
> > /etc/rc6.d/S35networking
> > /etc/rcS.d/S40networking
>
> Is not the final run level 5.
The default runlevel is 2 in Debian. Unless otherwise modified all
run levels have the same configuration and are identical to each other
in Debian.
On Tuesday 24 July 2007, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Those init.d files are not stock Debian. They have been modified.
>
> However since the rc0.d and rcS.d files still exists with low numbers
> then networking will start very early. Those S99 files are simply red
> herrings for you distracting you from
David Baron wrote:
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >I have:
> > >/etc/rc0.d/S35networking
> > >/etc/rc2.d/S99networking
> > >/etc/rc3.d/S99networking
> > >/etc/rc5.d/S99networking
> > >/etc/rc6.d/S35networking
> > >/etc/rcS.d/S40networking
> > >
> > >S99 is what is being hit.
> >
> > And I would call ANY
On Tuesday 24 July 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 July 2007, David Baron wrote:
> >> >> Humm, with my lashup here that Joanne helped me setup,
> >> >> S78spamassassin starts a few copies of spamd, and fetchmail is
> >> >> started much later in S99local. Its fetchmail that calls procmail
On Tuesday 24 July 2007, David Baron wrote:
>> >> Humm, with my lashup here that Joanne helped me setup, S78spamassassin
>> >> starts a few copies of spamd, and fetchmail is started much later in
>> >> S99local. Its fetchmail that calls procmail, and its procmail that
>> >> calls the spamd's, so t
>> >Problem is that the S78 will start spamassassin but that start does not
>> >necessarily get a valid rule-set. For that, the internet connection must
>> > be up at the time.
>>
>> And why would it not be when the network start is S10network?
>
>I have:
>/etc/rc0.d/S35networking
>/etc/rc2.d/S99ne
> >> Humm, with my lashup here that Joanne helped me setup, S78spamassassin
> >> starts a few copies of spamd, and fetchmail is started much later in
> >> S99local. Its fetchmail that calls procmail, and its procmail that
> >> calls the spamd's, so there is no time that SA can be bypassed.
> >>
>
David Baron wrote:
Problem is that the S78 will start spamassassin but that start does not
necessarily get a valid rule-set.
This is the bit puzzling me: Why must sa-update complete sucessfully
for spamd to start? The default SA rules should be shipped in the
package, and be placed in (typi
On Monday 23 July 2007, David Baron wrote:
>On Monday 23 July 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 23 July 2007, David Baron wrote:
[...]
>> Humm, with my lashup here that Joanne helped me setup, S78spamassassin
>> starts a few copies of spamd, and fetchmail is started much later in
>> S99local.
On Monday 23 July 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 23 July 2007, David Baron wrote:
> >>I mean the obvious stuff like "viagra" and such. Usually the spam is
> >> caught but sporadically it does get through.
> >>
> >>What is happening.
> >
> >Simply, there are no X-Spam headers on these (and no
On Monday 23 July 2007, David Baron wrote:
>>I mean the obvious stuff like "viagra" and such. Usually the spam is caught
>>but sporadically it does get through.
>>
>>What is happening.
>
>Simply, there are no X-Spam headers on these (and none or some of the "ham"
> as well). In other words, message
>I mean the obvious stuff like "viagra" and such. Usually the spam is caught
>but sporadically it does get through.
>What is happening.
Simply, there are no X-Spam headers on these (and none or some of the "ham" as
well). In other words, messages are being delivered before sa is running!
Origi
David Baron wrote:
> I mean the obvious stuff like "viagra" and such. Usually the spam is caught
> but sporadically it does get through.
>
> What is happening.
>
>
There are dozens of possible causes.
What version of SA are you using?
Are the ones that are going through image or PDF based?
D
I mean the obvious stuff like "viagra" and such. Usually the spam is caught
but sporadically it does get through.
What is happening.
15 matches
Mail list logo
