Re: Suspicious URL:Re: Suspicious URL:Re: Greylisting delay (was Re: Q about short-circuit over ruling blacklisting rule)

[Daniel McDonald]

On 1/19/11 2:35 PM, "John Hardin" <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Daniel McDonald wrote:
> 
>> On 1/19/11 10:17 AM, "John Hardin" <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Lee Dilkie wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Don't get me wrong, I liked GL but there are a number of big ISPs that
>>>> have quite long retry timeouts (for some reason, sympatico comes to
>>>> mind) and it got to be too annoying.
>>> 
>>> ...and when you encounter a big ISP that does this, do you notify their
>>> postmaster so they can fix the problem?
>> 
>> Or add a grey-listing exception and publish it to the sqlgrey list so that
>> the rest of us can also add an exception?
> 
> Is the whitelist available standalone for those of us who don't use
> sqlgrey? I couldn't see it and didn't want to grab the entire tarball.
> 
> (As I was researching this I came across a posting to the sqlgrey list
> from 2005 mentioning a whitelist entry request on behalf of a C/R vendor,
> and my first thought was "what, we want to _encourage_ C/R?")
The files are accessible at
http://sqlgrey.bouton.name

The available files are MD5SUMS, README, clients_fqdn_whitelist,
clients_ip_whitelist, dyn_fqdn.regexp, smtp_server.regexp

There is a script in the tarball to retrieve the changed files by comparing
the published md5sum with that on disk and only pulling down those that are
different.


-- 
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281