On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:40:27 -0400
Alex wrote:
> Even 2.8 points for merely the word "xanax" alone, without any other
> basis for consideration, sounds too high.
Actually it's looking for something that looks like xanax, but isn't
xanax.
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, these FUZZY rules
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 24 Apr 2017, at 21:35, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules:
Hi,
>> It also hit a secondary RBL for an IP that it shouldn't have, as well
>> as bayes00 and hostkarma_bl, totaling 5.044, making it spam. The IP
>> that was hit was 52.40.63.1, mta1b3.c1-t.msyscloud.com.
>>
>> I would have included that initially, but I figured any one phrase
>> shouldn't be en
It happened again. This is a kind of a recursion bomb ;-)
Am 25.04.2017 um 03:35 schrieb Alex:
> Pkte Regelname Beschreibung
> -- --
> 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
> b
On 24 Apr 2017, at 21:35, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
==> got hit: "your account security"
What *else* h
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
==> got hit: "your account security"
What *else* hit? W
Hi,
>> Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
>> the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
>>
>> Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
>> ==> got hit: "your account security"
>
> What *else* hit? What was the final tot
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
==> got hit: "your account security"
What *else* hit? What wa
Hi, this rule hit a citibank.com email. Adding 1.8 points simply for
the phrase "your account security" does not seem reasonable.
Apr 24 20:13:18.660 [28524] dbg: rules: ran body rule TVD_PH_SEC
==> got hit: "your account security"
Thanks,
Alex
