Am 22.02.2015 um 15:30 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 21 Feb 2015, at 08:34 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2015, at 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
bayes-stats.txt
That is a lot cleaner and more obvious, thank you for sharing
I ran this just after log rotation
On 21 Feb 2015, at 08:34 , LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2015, at 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
bayes-stats.txt
That is a lot cleaner and more obvious, thank you for sharing
I ran this just after log rotation and got div by zero errors, so here is a
On Feb 18, 2015, at 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
bayes-stats.txt
That is a lot cleaner and more obvious, thank you for sharing
--
Once again I teeter at the precipice of the generation gap.
Am 17.02.2015 um 15:23 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 17.02.2015 um 15:19 schrieb LuKreme:
On 16 Feb 2015, at 12:01 , Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
given that 24266 messages had BAYES_00 with a total number of 30401
delivered mails in the current month that training strategy seems to
