Re: Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-23 Thread Matt Kettler
CORRECTION OF MY PREVIOUS STATEMENTS: SBL doesn't appear to use a bitmask format as I suggested earlier. 127.0.0.6 would appear to be a valid answer for XBL only. It looks like they might use format 2 below, and SA's query implementation reflects this. Their choice of listing numbers suggests 1),

RE: Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-22 Thread List Mail User
>... >Ah, List, Matt, and Dallas, thanks all. Used all of them to get the answer >I was looking for. > >So simply parsing the the "Answer" section to see if there was a 127.0.0.2 >response should verify for me, it seems. > >I also vaguely remember reading something about .4 and .6 responses as wel

RE: Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-22 Thread Aaron Boyles
m: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 6:09 PM To: Aaron Boyles Cc: SpamAssassin Subject: Re: Using Dig for RBL lookups. Aaron Boyles wrote: > Ah, List, Matt, and Dallas, thanks all. Used all of them to get the > answer I was looking for. > > So

Re: Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-22 Thread Matt Kettler
Aaron Boyles wrote: > Ah, List, Matt, and Dallas, thanks all. Used all of them to get the answer > I was looking for. > > So simply parsing the the "Answer" section to see if there was a 127.0.0.2 > response should verify for me, it seems. > > I also vaguely remember reading something about .4 a

RE: Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-22 Thread Aaron Boyles
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 5:52 PM To: SpamAssassin Subject: RE: Using Dig for RBL lookups. > -Original Message- > From: Aaron Boyles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 4:46 PM > To: SpamAssassin > Subject: Using Dig for RBL lookups. > &

Re: Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-22 Thread Matt Kettler
Aaron Boyles wrote: > So far, so good. Everything I'm trying gives me an NXDOMAIN response, > though. Anyone have a couple of IPs that are on Spamhaus that I could use > for testing purposes? > > -Aaron Boyles > ITC Applications Programmer > Try the "latest 25" SBL listings off the spamhaus web

RE: Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-22 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Aaron Boyles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 4:46 PM > To: SpamAssassin > Subject: Using Dig for RBL lookups. > > So far, so good. Everything I'm trying gives me an NXDOMAIN > response, though. Any

Re: Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-22 Thread List Mail User
>... >So far, so good. Everything I'm trying gives me an NXDOMAIN response, >though. Anyone have a couple of IPs that are on Spamhaus that I could use >for testing purposes? > >-Aaron Boyles >ITC Applications Programmer > Almost all RBLs (not RHSBLs) will respond to the test point 127.0.0.

Using Dig for RBL lookups.

2005-12-22 Thread Aaron Boyles
So far, so good. Everything I'm trying gives me an NXDOMAIN response, though. Anyone have a couple of IPs that are on Spamhaus that I could use for testing purposes? -Aaron Boyles ITC Applications Programmer