On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:26:22AM -0600, Steve Bondy wrote:
> Is it safe to write a rule that triggers on the content of the Message
> ID header?
The 70_sare_header.cf found here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_header.cf
has a number of message ID rules that work pretty well. A
Hello Steve, Matt,
Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 10:27:32 AM, you wrote:
MK> At 12:26 PM 1/5/2005, Steve Bondy wrote:
>>Is it safe to write a rule that triggers on the content of the Message
>>ID header?
MK> Yes...
Agreed.
>>I frequently see things coming in which have message IDs that
>>include
> Is it safe to write a rule that triggers on the content of the Message
> ID header?
Sure.
> I frequently see things coming in which have message IDs that include
> the domain name of the target mail system, rather than the source mail
> system. If I remember correctly, the message ID should al
At 12:26 PM 1/5/2005, Steve Bondy wrote:
Is it safe to write a rule that triggers on the content of the Message
ID header?
Yes...
I frequently see things coming in which have message IDs that include
the domain name of the target mail system, rather than the source mail
system. If I remember corr
Also there is that whole "MessageID added by MTA" thing ;)
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:47 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Using Message ID in a rule
>
>
>
Unfortunately it is not. People on mailing lists will see message IDs
that come from themselves. Therefore a rule that searches for message
IDs from their own domain would logically end up throwing incorrectly
high scores on their own messages from the mailing list. If that is
not bad enough cowork
They say that if you don't know something, there's no such thing as a
stupid question so here goes:
Is it safe to write a rule that triggers on the content of the Message
ID header?
I frequently see things coming in which have message IDs that include
the domain name of the target mail system
