On Oct 27, 2004, at 9:33 PM, Gavin Cato wrote:
Hi Robert,
Why couldn't you simply install another perfectly running copy of SA
on server A, and let the users on that machine call spamc directly on
that machine?
I'd prefer the one copy so I can maintain the one ruleset, Bayesian
database, AWL etc.
s
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 02:33:07PM +1000, Gavin Cato wrote:
> > Why couldn't you simply install another perfectly running copy of SA
> > on server A, and let the users on that machine call spamc directly
> > on that machine?
>
> I'd prefer the one copy so I can maintain the one ruleset, Bayesian
>
Hello Gavin,
Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 9:33:07 PM, you wrote:
GC> Hi Robert,
>> Why couldn't you simply install another perfectly running copy of
>> SA on server A, and let the users on that machine call spamc
>> directly on that machine?
GC> I'd prefer the one copy so I can maintain the o
Hi Robert,
> Why couldn't you simply install another perfectly running copy of SA
> on server A, and let the users on that machine call spamc directly on
> that machine?
I'd prefer the one copy so I can maintain the one ruleset, Bayesian
database, AWL etc.
Cheers
Gav
Hello Gavin,
Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 6:36:03 PM, you wrote:
GC> I have 2 servers. Server A & Server B.
GC> Server B has a perfectly running copy of Spam Assassin 3.0.1
GC> running on it, and is acting as a "MX Proxy" doing SA systemwide
GC> via milter for those domains going through it.
GC>
Hi,
I have 2 servers. Server A & Server B.
Server B has a perfectly running copy of Spam Assassin 3.0.1 running on it,
and is acting as a "MX Proxy" doing SA systemwide via milter for those
domains going through it.
I want Server A, which is a mail server which a few thousand POP boxes, to
be ab
