Re: Using SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Fedora 29 package on CentOS 7

2018-10-10 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:27:01PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 10/10/2018 9:43 PM, Henrik K wrote: > >There's no need to avoid editing .pre files. They are versioned for reason > >and old ones are never changed after release. > > The SPF plugin is enabled in init.pre, so it isn't versione

Re: Using SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Fedora 29 package on CentOS 7

2018-10-10 Thread Kenneth Porter
On 10/10/2018 9:43 PM, Henrik K wrote: There's no need to avoid editing .pre files. They are versioned for reason and old ones are never changed after release. The SPF plugin is enabled in init.pre, so it isn't versioned. But it's marked as a config file in RPM so it won't be overwritten by a

Re: Using SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Fedora 29 package on CentOS 7

2018-10-10 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 06:41:21PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > (I'd wanted to avoid editing the distro-supplied file and change the > setting in a subsequent site file but that's not possible to opt out of a > loadplugin.) There's no need to avoid editing .pre files. They are versioned for rea

Using SpamAssassin 3.4.2 Fedora 29 package on CentOS 7

2018-10-10 Thread Kenneth Porter
I'm trying to update my CentOS 7 distro 3.4.0 package to the 3.4.2 source package in the Fedora 29 repo and wanted to alert others to possible issues. (Why is there