Re: Using sa-compile are local rules compiled?

2013-04-21 Thread RW
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:47:49 +0100 John Horne wrote: > > That's the received wisdom, but I've never seen a definitive reason > > why. Compiled rules are intended to co-exit with non-compiled rules, > > and from my limited testing, rules behave correctly when they are > > added, removed or modifie

Re: Using sa-compile are local rules compiled?

2013-04-21 Thread John Horne
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 14:08 +0100, RW wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:40:33 +0100 > John Horne wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We are running SpamAssassin 3.3.2 on a CentOS 5.9 server. sa-update > > runs via a daily cron job, and we have modified that to run > > sa-compile as well. However, there are

Re: Using sa-compile are local rules compiled?

2013-04-18 Thread RW
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:40:33 +0100 John Horne wrote: > Hello, > > We are running SpamAssassin 3.3.2 on a CentOS 5.9 server. sa-update > runs via a daily cron job, and we have modified that to run > sa-compile as well. However, there are some questions: > > sa-compile is run without any options.

Using sa-compile are local rules compiled?

2013-04-17 Thread John Horne
Hello, We are running SpamAssassin 3.3.2 on a CentOS 5.9 server. sa-update runs via a daily cron job, and we have modified that to run sa-compile as well. However, there are some questions: sa-compile is run without any options. So what I am unsure of is whether our local rules (in /etc/mail/spam