Whitelist_to -- explicit pass

2004-09-29 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin
Hi, I want to set up a whitelist_to for my abuse@ address, but the problem is that it only kicks the score down by six, and when people are forwarding spam to it, well, the score's still WAY too high. Is there some setting that will just say don't even scan it or something? -Dan -- I want to

Re: Whitelist_to -- explicit pass

2004-09-29 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:03:59AM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Is there some setting that will just say don't even scan it or something? Try all_spam_to. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: double value;/* or your money back! */ short changed; /* so

Re: Whitelist_to -- explicit pass

2004-09-29 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:03 AM 9/29/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: I want to set up a whitelist_to for my abuse@ address, but the problem is that it only kicks the score down by six, and when people are forwarding spam to it, well, the score's still WAY too high. Is there some setting that will just say

Re: Whitelist_to -- explicit pass

2004-09-29 Thread Matt Kettler
At 11:04 AM 9/29/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: Aah, yes, but this is called from a system-wide procmail file. Yeah? so? Set up a procmail rule to bypass the call to spamc when the recipient is the user you don't want scanned. System wide vs per-user calls of procmail does not matter

Re: Whitelist_to -- explicit pass

2004-09-29 Thread Mário Gamito
Hi Matt, Matt Kettler wrote: Yeah? so? Set up a procmail rule to bypass the call to spamc when the recipient is the user you don't want scanned. I'm very intereseted in this, since i have one user that is constantly throwing my server down due to the amount and size of the mail she receives.