W dniu 26.09.2011 15:53, Bowie Bailey pisze:
There is nothing in that sample that would cause the rule to fire. I
downloaded it and ran it against my SA and did not get a match for
MISSING_SUBJECT. The only thing I can think of is that the headers end
at the first blank line. If there is a bla
W dniu 26.09.2011 15:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
I don't see other X-Spam headers there. How are you running
spamassassin? Aren't you using amavis ot other software using just
spamassassin libraries?
Are you sure some 3rd party does not modify mail headers?
No, i don't use any 3rd packag
On 9/26/2011 9:37 AM, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
> Hello!
> I'd like to ask you if this rule works correctly? I've sended email from
> thunderbird and roundcube and in both cases this rule scores email. Here
> is sample email: http://pastebin.com/rVTwNp5X (with little mungled
> recipient).
> Rules a
On 26.09.11 15:37, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
I'd like to ask you if this rule works correctly? I've sended email
from thunderbird and roundcube and in both cases this rule scores
email. Here is sample email: http://pastebin.com/rVTwNp5X (with
little mungled recipient).
Rules are in version: 11620
Hello!
I'd like to ask you if this rule works correctly? I've sended email from
thunderbird and roundcube and in both cases this rule scores email. Here
is sample email: http://pastebin.com/rVTwNp5X (with little mungled
recipient).
Rules are in version: 1162027, spamassassin-3.3.2
Thanks for h
