>On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote:
>> My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and
>> just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It
>> also reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail
>> automatically expiring out of Bayes,
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:01:28 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote:
>
> >> My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and
> >> just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It
> >> also reduces the inciden
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote:
My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and
just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It also
reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail
automatically expiring out of Bayes, leading to F
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote:
My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and
just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It also
reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail
automatically ex
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400 Kris Deugau wrote:
My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and
just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It also
reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail
automatically expiring out of Bayes, leading to
Are you able to submit your spam to PCC / KAM.
That way the community as a whole can be benefit.
Regards
Brent
On 2021/03/16 19:16, Steve Dondley wrote:
I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into
different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw
it
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:42:14 -0400
Kris Deugau wrote:
> My own experience has been that accumulating blobs of ham/spam and
> just repeatedly running sa-learn over those works just fine. It also
> reduces the incidence of tokens from somewhat rarer mail
> automatically expiring out of Bayes, lead
Steve Dondley wrote:
I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into
different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw it
into the existing pile and then run "sa-learn --spam|--ham" on the whole
pile.
It dawned on me that this will get very slow as I ev
On 16.03.21 13:16, Steve Dondley wrote:
I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into
different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw
it into the existing pile and then run "sa-learn --spam|--ham" on the
whole pile.
It dawned on me that this will ge
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:33:58 -0400
Steve Dondley wrote:
> You covered a lot of ground here. Thanks.. If you have some spare
> cycles, I have follow up questions to get an understanding of how you
> process your email:
>
I presume this is a reply to Harold, in which case I would take it
with a
You covered a lot of ground here. Thanks.. If you have some spare
cycles, I have follow up questions to get an understanding of how you
process your email:
21 seconds at that includes fetch the samples via imap from two
folders, fire them against a bayes-only spamassasin instance,
What is a
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:16:49 -0400
Steve Dondley wrote:
> I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into
> different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw
> it into the existing pile and then run "sa-learn --spam|--ham" on the
> whole pile.
>
> It dawne
I have been accumulating spam/ham samples and sorting them out into
different directories on my server. As new spam/ham comes in, I throw it
into the existing pile and then run "sa-learn --spam|--ham" on the whole
pile.
It dawned on me that this will get very slow as I eventually collect
tens
13 matches
Mail list logo
