Hi:
We're getting hit with a lot of emails with blank subject lines and blank
contents. Could be some kind of address verification robot. Is SA supposed
to filter these? If not, does anyone have some custom rules that would do it?
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
Hello Jeff,
Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 10:09:29 AM, you wrote:
JK> We're getting hit with a lot of emails with blank subject lines and blank
JK> contents. Could be some kind of address verification robot. Is SA supposed
JK> to filter these? If not, does anyone have some custom rules that would d
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:17:57PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
> An S/O of 0.812 for SARE_EMPTY_SUBJ_BODY is maybe worth a point or so,
> but it's not a strong enough indicator of spam to be worth much.
Ewww! (I'd just delete things around 0.8...)
It doesn't hit a ton, but there is a rule in 3
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:18 PM
> Posted To: sa-users
> Conversation: blank subject and contents
> Subject: Re: blank subject and contents
>
> Hello Jeff,
>
> Tuesday, Decem
Jeff Koch wrote:
Hi:
We're getting hit with a lot of emails with blank subject lines and
blank contents. Could be some kind of address verification robot. Is SA
supposed to filter these? If not, does anyone have some custom rules
that would do it?
I asked about this last week, search for "blank
> We're getting hit with a lot of emails with blank subject lines and blank
> contents. Could be some kind of address verification robot. Is SA supposed
> to filter these? If not, does anyone have some custom rules that would do
it?
My theory is this is the result of some newbie spammer that doesn
