Re: character set / encoding problem?

2005-05-01 Thread wolfgang
In an older episode (Sunday 01 May 2005 02:07), Loren Wilton wrote: Again and again, we receive messages that contain stuff like a href=3dhttp://advinc-ma=2enetfirms=2ecom/; instead of a href=http://advinc-ma.netfirms.com/; That prevents uri / body rules like e.g. no/yes

character set / encoding problem?

2005-04-30 Thread wolfgang
Again and again, we receive messages that contain stuff like a href=3dhttp://advinc-ma=2enetfirms=2ecom/; instead of a href=http://advinc-ma.netfirms.com/; That prevents uri / body rules like e.g. /netfirms\.com/ and URIBL rules from being triggered. I wonder if there is some function to

Re: character set / encoding problem?

2005-04-30 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 01:27:39PM +0200, wolfgang wrote: Again and again, we receive messages that contain stuff like a href=3dhttp://advinc-ma=2enetfirms=2ecom/; instead of a href=http://advinc-ma.netfirms.com/; I wonder if there is some function to automatically de-code such items

Re: character set / encoding problem?

2005-04-30 Thread wolfgang
In an older episode (Saturday 30 April 2005 14:45), Theo Van Dinter wrote: =3d is quoted-printable encoding for =, =2e for ., etc... SA handles proper encoding (it handles a lot of non-proper encoding as well), but doesn't make guesses if the MIME part says there is no encoding. Without

Re: character set / encoding problem?

2005-04-30 Thread Fred
wolfgang wrote: In an older episode (Saturday 30 April 2005 14:45), Theo Van Dinter wrote: =3d is quoted-printable encoding for =, =2e for ., etc... SA handles proper encoding (it handles a lot of non-proper encoding as well), but doesn't make guesses if the MIME part says there is no

Re: character set / encoding problem?

2005-04-30 Thread David B Funk
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 01:27:39PM +0200, wolfgang wrote: Again and again, we receive messages that contain stuff like a href=3dhttp://advinc-ma=2enetfirms=2ecom/; instead of a href=http://advinc-ma.netfirms.com/; I wonder if there is some

Re: character set / encoding problem?

2005-04-30 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:41:57PM -0500, David B Funk wrote: We've already gone 'round this issue in past discussions on this list, the DEVs reply was, maybe 'fixed' in future releases. Ok, fair enough. Then FYI: 3.1 handles the lowercase version. :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: I was up