This domain is listed on SURBL (ws/jp) and URIBL (Black). SA 3.1 is
able to parse and lookup these "copy/paste" type URLs.
Loren Wilton wrote:
I'm not positive, but I think SARE might have a rule or two for these. I
know that recent versions of SA were looking at detecting this themselves,
b
I'm not positive, but I think SARE might have a rule or two for these. I
know that recent versions of SA were looking at detecting this themselves,
but I don't recall the status of that. 3.1 *might* be able to detect these
itself.
Loren
> If your a lady, take a "monster!"
>
> notoriousb
I see some traffic back in July for the plain text spam with "copy and
paste the link to your browser" and variants in the message body, used to
bypass the URIBL rules. Was a rule set ever created to catch these? Sample
body below:
--
Imagine a new huge D1ck full of energy. Just huge.
Smash t
