Sure we can do
meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2
but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is
positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs
ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but that not what
I want to do. I suppose branching is only poss
On 17/12/2008 8:26 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Sure we can do
> meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2
> but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is
> positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs
> ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but
jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Sure we can do
> meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2
> but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is
> positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs
> ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but that not what
> I want