do TEST2 only if TEST1 was positive

Sure we can do meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2 but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but that not what I want to do. I suppose branching is only poss

Re: do TEST2 only if TEST1 was positive

On 17/12/2008 8:26 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Sure we can do > meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2 > but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is > positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs > ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but

Re: do TEST2 only if TEST1 was positive

jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Sure we can do > meta META0 TEST1 && TEST2 > but say TEST2 is expensive, and we only want it to be run if TEST1 is > positive. I suppose SpamAssassin's whole train of thought has no ifs > ands or buts, other than a method of quitting early, but that not what > I want