Re: googlepages.com abuse

2007-12-25 Thread Ramprasad
alex wrote: I made a script too, then I found your script when I searched later! Your script is more efficient, now I just use yours :P I call it directly from procmail. glad to be of use , it was not a great effort though BTW I think google has started taking complaints seriously. I dont

Re: googlepages.com abuse

2007-12-24 Thread alex
I made a script too, then I found your script when I searched later! Your script is more efficient, now I just use yours :P I call it directly from procmail. On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:42:53AM +0530, ram wrote: #!/usr/bin/perl # Script to emulate a browser for posting a abuse complaint to

RE: googlepages.com abuse

2007-11-14 Thread ram
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 06:32 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote: -Original Message- From: ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:33 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: googlepages.com abuse I have recently starting seeing spams with URLS

googlepages.com abuse

2007-11-13 Thread ram
I have recently starting seeing spams with URLS contining googlepages websites Currently I am scoring all googlepages.com link mails with 1.5 :-( How do you folks trap these mails , And how do we report abuse to google ( if they really bother ) Thanks Ram

RE: googlepages.com abuse

2007-11-13 Thread Michael Scheidell
-Original Message- From: ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:33 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: googlepages.com abuse I have recently starting seeing spams with URLS containing Google pages websites Currently I am scoring all

Re: googlepages.com abuse

2007-11-13 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Nov 13, 2007 3:32 AM, Michael Scheidell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you folks trap these mails , And how do we report abuse to google ( if they really bother ) You can't. Google ignores complaints, and email to @googlepages.com will bounce in 5 days due to their refusal to even

Re: googlepages.com abuse

2007-11-13 Thread SM
At 19:31 13-11-2007, Bart Schaefer wrote: Er, which RFC are you claiming requires them to have a server to receive mail? It's a BCP quoted by SMTP folks to annoy Web-enabled people. :-) Regards, -sm