Bill Landry wrote:
>
> So, Matt, are you doing something like:
>
>bayes_ignore_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can check the exact syntax, but yes.
>
> How does this compare to:
>
>bayes_ignore_to users@spamassassin.apache.org
>
> Is one way preferable to the other?
The bayes_ignore_to will fail f
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No.. the only thing I generally whitelist is spam discussion lists
like this one
(and I do bayes_ignore_from for them as well). It would be better to
bypass SA
entirely, but I don't have that option in my setup.
Matt, just
Bill Landry wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>> Final question for the moment... our old local.cf file had a lengthy
>>> whitelist included. Is there any reason necessarily to have a
>>> whitelist?
>>
>> No.. the only thing I generally whitelist i
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Final question for the moment... our old local.cf file had a lengthy
whitelist included. Is there any reason necessarily to have a
whitelist?
No.. the only thing I generally whitelist is spam discussion lists like
this o
Jeff Portwine wrote:
> Is there any good method
> for users to submit email as spam when spam gets through to help SA
> learn it as spam?
Yes, that can be a tough one. If you have a standardized mail client, you might
look and see if it has a reasonable "redirect" or "bounce" feature that
preser
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff Portwine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: having trouble with SA
Jeff Portwine wrote:
The spam levels are getting high again, users
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jeff Portwine wrote:
The spam levels are getting high again, users are complaining, and so
today I did an apt-get spamassassin to upgrade to version 3.1.0. I
then used the configuration tool at
http://www.yrex.com/spam/spamconfig.php to create a new local.cf and
replace
Jeff Portwine wrote:
> The spam levels are getting high again, users are complaining, and so
> today I did an apt-get spamassassin to upgrade to version 3.1.0. I
> then used the configuration tool at
> http://www.yrex.com/spam/spamconfig.php to create a new local.cf and
> replaced the old one
I am running exim 3.35 in debian.We were using spamassassin 3.0, but we
have been having a lot of trouble with spam getting through.Some gets
caught but a lot doesn't and over time it gets worse and worse. The
person who originally set up our mailserver and spamassassin left the
com
