Michael Scheidell wrote on Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:27:50 -0500:
> which is why I think it should be in one of those html_eval plugins,
I agree, it would be more helpful and less ressource-hungry there.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.cona
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
As I understand even those clients that produce empty style tags do this in the
header and not in the body. There's a chance that you FP on body/style sections
that appear in text/plain parts (e.g. samples) - AFAIK there is no test that
matches only in text/html parts, s
Kenneth Porter wrote on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:59:54 -0800:
> A simple-minded autodetect system would just look at the first tokens to
> spot HTML tags, like , ,
> , or . An initial paragraph
> of
> plain text would be enough to prevent it from interpreting later HTML
> examples as making the whol
--On Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:31 PM +0100 Kai Schaetzl
wrote:
Aren't there any MUAs that try to autodetect the right content type?
Even from microsoft?
No. If they would then you couldn't send any plain text messages that
*discuss* HTML code with examples.
A simple-minded autodetect s
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:41:51 +0100:
> Aren't there any MUAs that try to autodetect the right content type?
> Even from microsoft?
No. If they would then you couldn't send any plain text messages that
*discuss* HTML code with examples.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, G
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:56 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> IE had a nasty habit of ignoring the MIME type in HTTP headers and
> rendering HTML even when one wanted it displayed as text/plain. So it
> wouldn't surprise me if Outlook (Express) had the same annoying
> "helpfulness".
>
I've wasted
--On Friday, January 30, 2009 4:41 PM +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
Aren't there any MUAs that try to autodetect the right content type?
Even from microsoft?
IE had a nasty habit of ignoring the MIME type in HTTP headers and
rendering HTML even when one wanted it displayed as text/pla
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:47 -0800, Kelson wrote:
>On the subject of vs