Re: is DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX too low?

2008-01-28 Thread Jason Haar
Joseph Brennan wrote: I looked at our spam reports (spam that was not rejected). It looks to me like the biggest target to go for is mail supposedly from The Bat! direct to your MX. Most of the supposed The Bat! spam matches, and it is very low scoring. Yes - I just saw that too - like Outl

Re: is DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX too low?

2008-01-28 Thread Joseph Brennan
> For those that don't know it means "Delivered direct to MX with Outlook > headers". Sounds like a good rule: Outlook isn't a MTA so shouldn't be > able to connect directly to MX records - except for it's configured > SMTP server. I looked at our spam reports (spam that was not rejected).

Re: is DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX too low?

2008-01-26 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 20:37 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Jason Haar wrote: > > I just got a spam msg with a score of 4/5 and for the first time noticed > > the DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX rule. > > > > For those that don't know it means "Delivered direct to MX with Outlook > > headers". Sounds like a

Re: is DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX too low?

2008-01-26 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Jason Haar wrote: > Hi there > > I just got a spam msg with a score of 4/5 and for the first time noticed > the DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX rule. > > For those that don't know it means "Delivered direct to MX with Outlook > headers". Sounds like a good rule: Outlook isn't a MTA so shouldn't be > able to co

is DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX too low?

2008-01-26 Thread Jason Haar
Hi there I just got a spam msg with a score of 4/5 and for the first time noticed the DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX rule. For those that don't know it means "Delivered direct to MX with Outlook headers". Sounds like a good rule: Outlook isn't a MTA so shouldn't be able to connect directly to MX records