Apparently I am not sure if bayes is autolearning
I am on a shared host service (midphase)
which uses cPanel and has exim do the spamassassin stuff.
They use my scores but ignore other commands.
When I get a message I think I shouldn't have I
save it and run spamc m .out inorder to
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 20:59 -0400, Dennis German wrote:
email with this content:
Do *NOT* paste spam samples to the list. Use a pastebin or upload them
to your own server and provide a link instead.
X-Spam-testscores: BAYES_00=-2.599,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MISSING_HEADERS=5.7,
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 22:13 -0400, Alex wrote:
If you're using autolearning, what are your learning thresholds?
What do you recommend for thresholds? I'm considering using
autolearning, but very concerned about corrupting the database. I
think I would use something like +15 for spam.
I
On ons 26 aug 2009 15:23:01 CEST, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote
X-Spam-testscores: BAYES_00=-2.599,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MISSING_HEADERS=5.7,
SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=3.1,UPPERCASE_75_100=1.528
That MISSING_HEADERS score is custom, and *way* off-base IMHO.
question is more what header is missing
--
email with this content:
CONGRATULATION YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS WON YOU THE 2010 FIFA WORLDCUP LOTTER=
Y OPEN THE ATTACHMENT AND VIEW THE PROFILE OF YOUR WINNING FUND=2C ALSO CON=
TACT YOUR CLAIM AGENT
received these scores
X-Spam-testscores:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Dennis German wrote:
email with this content:
CONGRATULATION YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS HAS WON YOU THE 2010 FIFA WORLDCUP LOTTER=
Y OPEN THE ATTACHMENT AND VIEW THE PROFILE OF YOUR WINNING FUND=2C ALSO CON=
TACT YOUR CLAIM AGENT
received these scores
X-Spam-testscores:
Hi,
If you're using autolearning, what are your learning thresholds?
What do you recommend for thresholds? I'm considering using
autolearning, but very concerned about corrupting the database. I
think I would use something like +15 for spam.
There are FNs on occasion in the 2.x range with low
On ons 26 aug 2009 02:59:06 CEST, Dennis German wrote
X-Spam-testscores: BAYES_00=-2.599,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MISSING_HEADERS=5.7,
SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=3.1,UPPERCASE_75_100=1.528
Does this indicate that bayes needs tuning/learning?
if you want bayes to know its spam yes, remember to train every
