>LW> Dont forget the -m option. If you have more than about 5 children
>LW> running and don't have a huge email flow you might do well to cut
the
>LW> number of children down to the 3 to 10 range.
>
> What is considered "huge email flow" and what are appropriate values for
> connection
> "LW" == Loren Wilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I just noticed the --max-conn-per-child option in the spamd man page.
>> While the description is fairly straightforward, I'm curious if anyone
>> else is using this
LW> Yes, many people
>> , why, and if it's helped with sp
Depending on the weather, phase of the moon, amount of ram you have, and
other things, you may find limits from a couple hundred down to about 5 to
be appropriate. I'd probably suggest 100 to 50 as a good starting range
to
play with.
Dont forget the -m option. If you have more than about 5 ch
> I just noticed the --max-conn-per-child option in the spamd man page.
While
> the description is fairly straightforward, I'm curious if anyone else is
> using this
Yes, many people
, why, and if it's helped with spamd processes consuming RAM
> (which is what I'm trying to fix at the moment).
W
I just noticed the --max-conn-per-child option in the spamd man page. While
the description is fairly straightforward, I'm curious if anyone else is
using this, why, and if it's helped with spamd processes consuming RAM
(which is what I'm trying to fix at the moment).
