Re: mk_meta_rule_scores - does it work correctly?:)

Marcin Mirosław wrote: W dniu 2017-03-14 16:23, Kris Deugau napisał(a): If I read the information flow correctly, this is actually decided by seek-phrases-in-log, which spits out subrules that reached a certain hit rate in blocks, followed by the "# passed hit-rate threshold nnn" line. mk_meta_r

Re: mk_meta_rule_scores - does it work correctly?:)

W dniu 2017-03-14 16:23, Kris Deugau napisał(a): mar...@mejor.pl wrote: Hi! Thanks to AXB seek-in-phrases-in-log works OK. Now I'm on the next step with automated creating rules. I suspect that mk_meta_rule_scores doesn't assign scores correctly. I set in mk_meta_rule_scores: my %scoremap = (

Re: mk_meta_rule_scores - does it work correctly?:)

mar...@mejor.pl wrote: Hi! Thanks to AXB seek-in-phrases-in-log works OK. Now I'm on the next step with automated creating rules. I suspect that mk_meta_rule_scores doesn't assign scores correctly. I set in mk_meta_rule_scores: my %scoremap = ( '70' => '1.5', '4' => '2.0', '0.01' => '3.0'

mk_meta_rule_scores - does it work correctly?:)

Hi! Thanks to AXB seek-in-phrases-in-log works OK. Now I'm on the next step with automated creating rules. I suspect that mk_meta_rule_scores doesn't assign scores correctly. I set in mk_meta_rule_scores: my %scoremap = ( '70' => '1.5', '4' => '2.0', '0.01' => '3.0', ); $ cat tmp/clean.cf