On Sun, 11 Jul 2021, Martin Gregorie wrote:
BTW, the online regex development page URLs I gave were working as
expected at the time I wrote that note.
I second those resources, especially regex101.com - it has a visual
debugger that will step through the pattern matching process. It's *very*
You're right: my copy of the Camel book is the Third edition, from 2000.
The cover has a corner tagged with 'revised and updated'. The 4th
edition was released on 2012.
It covers Perl 5.6 with the title changed to
"Programming Perl: Unmatched power for text processing and scripting"
and also c
Martin Gregorie wrote:
If you have a copy of "The Camel Book", otherwise known as "Programming
Perl" by Larry Wall, Tom Christiansen & John Orwant" pub. O'reilly, or
know somebody who has a copy, have a read of Chapter 5 'Pattern
Matching' which contains about the clearest explanation of how re
Thanks for all the solutions and suggestions.
joe a.
> Anyone have a regex example handy that can detect any number of digits before
> @ sign?
> Not a regex maven at all. What searching I did on this topic just served to
> kick the bee hive.
>
>
Perhaps memory fails, but was there not, on
Martin Gregorie wrote:
Not a direct reply, but:
If you have a copy of "The Camel Book", otherwise known as "Programming
Perl" by Larry Wall, Tom Christiansen & John Orwant" pub. O'reilly, or
know somebody who has a copy, have a read of Chapter 5 'Pattern
Matching' which contains about the clear
Not a direct reply, but:
If you have a copy of "The Camel Book", otherwise known as "Programming
Perl" by Larry Wall, Tom Christiansen & John Orwant" pub. O'reilly, or
know somebody who has a copy, have a read of Chapter 5 'Pattern
Matching' which contains about the clearest explanation of how re
On Sat, 10 Jul 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Using SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20)
Perhaps memory fails, but was there not, once, a standard rule that detected
non alpha characters in
sender name? The domain/provider is not of interest for this question.
Such as this item (not the actual send
On 10.07.21 12:31, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Anyone have a regex example handy that can detect any number of digits before @
sign?
Not a regex maven at all. What searching I did on this topic just served to
kick the bee hive.
maybe it helps:
header FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS From =~ /\d{11}\S*\@/
On 2021-07-10 at 12:31:13 UTC-0400 (Sat, 10 Jul 2021 12:31:13 -0400)
Joe Acquisto-j4
is rumored to have said:
Anyone have a regex example handy that can detect any number of digits
before @ sign?
/[0-9]+\@/
Not a regex maven at all. What searching I did on this topic just
served to kick
Anyone have a regex example handy that can detect any number of digits before @
sign?
Not a regex maven at all. What searching I did on this topic just served to
kick the bee hive.
>> Perhaps memory fails, but was there not, once, a standard rule that
>> detected non alpha characters in
> se
Perhaps memory fails, but was there not, once, a standard rule that
detected non alpha characters in
sender name? The domain/provider is not of interest for this question.
I think there was, but I suspect that the spam/ham ratio would be about
even, which is probably why it doesn't show up now
Using SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20)
Perhaps memory fails, but was there not, once, a standard rule that detected
non alpha characters in
sender name? The domain/provider is not of interest for this question.
Such as this item (not the actual sender name)
* 1.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender
12 matches
Mail list logo
