Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-21 Thread Pedro David Marco
>Are you using the --round-robin option in spamd? If so try running >without it. >A long time ago the child management code was substantially updated, >but the legacy code with left in and accessed through that option. Thanks a lot RW... i am not using --round-robin option...  but i have start

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-21 Thread RW
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:47:04 + (UTC) Pedro David Marco wrote: > It has just happened now again... :-( > There are 2 spamd child processes in 'S' state... > i run spamc  -R if i run it again... i obtain 8.9 score!!! > if i run it again... i obtain 21.0 score!!! > > if i run it again... i obt

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-20 Thread Pedro David Marco
This is getting worse it seems that some spamd childs keep some data strucutures from one scan to the next and results are mangled over time  what a "funny" mess!!! :-( I have found that this only happens in Debian versions under 8.8, Debian 8.8 and 9.x seem to work nicely. Pedro

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.12.17 21:47, Pedro David Marco wrote: It has just happened now again... :-( There are 2 spamd child processes in 'S' state... i run spamc  -R can you show us those scores? pastebin please. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to recei

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-19 Thread Pedro David Marco
It has just happened now again... :-( There are 2 spamd child processes in 'S' state... i run spamc  -R

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-18 Thread Pedro David Marco
I understand that may be many blocking situations... buts SIGNALS are for that!  the process must attend the signal sooner or later... even if it has to wait untilthe end of the blocking situation... Yes, the blocking situation may unfortunatelly last for ever, but this is not the case since pr

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-18 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Bill Cole wrote: On 18 Dec 2017, at 14:32 (-0500), Pedro David Marco wrote: > maybe they are processing mail and will exit after it's done... Thanks Fantomas, this is what i would expect and it seems what happens...  spamd childs get the SIGNAL and act accordingly, but

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-18 Thread Bill Cole
On 18 Dec 2017, at 14:32 (-0500), Pedro David Marco wrote: maybe they are processing mail and will exit after it's done... Thanks Fantomas, this is what i would expect and it seems what happens...  spamd childs get the SIGNAL and act accordingly, but for some reason, sometimes they IGNORE t

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-18 Thread Pedro David Marco
>maybe they are processing mail and will exit after it's done... Thanks Fantomas, this is what i would expect and it seems what happens...  spamd childs get the SIGNAL and act accordingly, but for some reason, sometimes they IGNORE the SIGNAL... :-( --PedroD

Re: orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 15.12.17 10:22, Pedro David Marco wrote: For some time i am noticing that when spamd is restarted or reloaded because there a new rules, not all child processes are correctly restarted or reloaded and they remain workingwith the old file set (and hence old rules).  It looks like an orhpan chil

orphan spamd childs?

2017-12-15 Thread Pedro David Marco
Hello everybody... For some time i am noticing that when spamd is restarted or reloaded because there a new rules, not all child processes are correctly restarted or reloaded and they remain workingwith the old file set (and hence old rules).  It looks like an orhpan childs issue... So when new