Re: partial (lazy) scoring? - run a second time?

2009-09-25 Thread RW
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:32:35 + (UTC) ArtemGr wrote: > Benny Pedersen junc.org> writes: > > my former own mailhost have changed from spamassassin to dspam, less > > work for him and his users, and definaly lees work for his low > > budget quad xeon intel server with 6Gb ram and alot of > > d

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? - run a second time?

2009-09-25 Thread ArtemGr
Benny Pedersen junc.org> writes: > fuzzyocr stop scanning if spam score is over a limit, why scan > ocr when spamassassin can do it without ocr ? Good to know. > it could maybe be a option to make spamassassin stop scanning in > generic if spam score is high ? > > there is alot of plugins tha

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? - run a second time?

2009-09-24 Thread Benny Pedersen
On tor 24 sep 2009 10:59:35 CEST, ArtemGr wrote Do you have measurements, or are you just imagining things? OCR-ing all the graphic attachments might be much slower than your usual spamassasin run. DCC and Pyzor checks might introduce large delays as well. fuzzyocr stop scanning if spam score i

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? (shortcircuit features)

2009-09-24 Thread Matt Kettler
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Matt Kettler verizon.net> writes: >> >>> In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this >>> (SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added): >>> > > On 22.09.09 11:46, ArtemGr wrote: > >> That would be a nic

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? - run a second time?

2009-09-24 Thread ArtemGr
Matus UHLAR - fantomas fantomas.sk> writes: > > That rises the question, whether the basic detections can be turned off. > > > > I found the following options: > > skip_rbl_checks 1 > > dns_available no > > use_bayes 0 > > use_bayes_rules 0 > > bayes_auto_learn 0 > > - but I do not see an option

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? (shortcircuit features)

2009-09-24 Thread ArtemGr
Matus UHLAR - fantomas fantomas.sk> writes: > You haven't read Matt's explanation of why it wasn't a good idea, did you? > > There are rules with negative scores, which can puch the score back to the > ham, e.g. whitelist. Would you like to stop scoring before e.g. whitelist is > checked? I am n

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? - run a second time?

2009-09-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> ArtemGr gmail.com> writes: > > I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests > > when the "required_score" is not yet reached. > > For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first, > > and if the score is lower than the "required_score", > > then do the DCC and RAZ

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? (shortcircuit features)

2009-09-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Matt Kettler verizon.net> writes: > > In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this > > (SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added): On 22.09.09 11:46, ArtemGr wrote: > That would be a nice optimization: most of the spam we receive have a >10 > sc

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? - run a second time?

2009-09-22 Thread ArtemGr
ArtemGr gmail.com> writes: > I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests > when the "required_score" is not yet reached. > For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first, > and if the score is lower than the "required_score", > then do the DCC and RAZOR2 tests. >

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? (shortcircuit features)

2009-09-22 Thread ArtemGr
Matt Kettler verizon.net> writes: > In theory, a feature could be added to let you do something like this > (SA doesn't have this feature, but I'm proposing it could be added): That would be a nice optimization: most of the spam we receive have a >10 score. It seems a real waste of resource to pe

Re: partial (lazy) scoring? (shortcircuit features)

2009-09-22 Thread Matt Kettler
ArtemGr wrote: > I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests > when the "required_score" is not yet reached. > For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first, > and if the score is lower than the "required_score", > then do the DCC and RAZOR2 tests. > > Is it poss

partial (lazy) scoring?

2009-09-22 Thread ArtemGr
I would like to configure Spamassassin to only do certain tests when the "required_score" is not yet reached. For example, do the usual rule-based and bayesian tests first, and if the score is lower than the "required_score", then do the DCC and RAZOR2 tests. Is it possible?