On 1/24/2015 11:09 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Thanks. But no recent entries in the archive might mean an issue with
the list. IIRC there was some discussion/warning about moving.
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201501.mbox/browser
shows 219 emails this month with
On 1/17/2015 at 9:22 PM, cool hand luke coolhandl...@coolhandluke.org
wrote:
On 01/17/2015 03:59 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Just checking.
From http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node25.html:
7.6 I don't seem to be getting mail from the lists. What should I do?
There are a few
Just checking.
On 01/17/2015 03:59 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Just checking.
From http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node25.html:
7.6 I don't seem to be getting mail from the lists. What should I do?
There are a few common reasons for this:
No one has sent any mail to the list(s) you're on for a little
Since about 18.00 yesterday, there seems to be a problem with retrieving
rules from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/rulename.cf. When I
retrieve any rule, I get the following HTML on the front, which causes
SA lint to fail. I have tried several rulesets and several different
hosts and still
Nick Leverton said:
Since about 18.00 yesterday, there seems to be a problem with retrieving
rules from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/rulename.cf. When I
retrieve any rule, I get the following HTML on the front, which causes
SA lint to fail. I have tried several rulesets and several
Since about 18.00 yesterday, there seems to be a problem
with retrieving
rules from http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/rulename.cf. When I
retrieve any rule, I get the following HTML on the front,
which causes
SA lint to fail. I have tried several rulesets and several different
hosts and
Perhaps something like:
- a higher priority MX is up
- the mail was delivered from a secondary MX with little or no delay
Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My concern was primarily for the secondary, where you don't know the delay
until you forward. Are you saying that the first
