Re: private networks are default rbl tested :/

2018-11-06 Thread RW
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 00:27:27 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote: > RW skrev den 2018-11-06 02:04: > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 23:37:59 +0100 > > Benny Pedersen wrote: > > > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network > >> > >> why are this network not default internal_networks trusted_networks > >>

Re: private networks are default rbl tested :/

2018-11-06 Thread Benny Pedersen
RW skrev den 2018-11-06 02:04: On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 23:37:59 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network why are this network not default internal_networks trusted_networks msa_networks They are if you let SA guess your networks. If you specify the networks

Re: private networks are default rbl tested :/

2018-11-06 Thread Bill Cole
On 5 Nov 2018, at 20:04, RW wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 23:37:59 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network why are this network not default internal_networks trusted_networks msa_networks They are if you let SA guess your networks. If you specify the

Re: private networks are default rbl tested :/

2018-11-05 Thread RW
On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 23:37:59 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network > > why are this network not default internal_networks trusted_networks > msa_networks They are if you let SA guess your networks. If you specify the networks manually you have to specify

private networks are default rbl tested :/

2018-11-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network why are this network not default internal_networks trusted_networks msa_networks spamassassin makes many wasted rbl tests with not knowing what to skip i like to make a good default config file for all this wastes :)