Re: Problems with BAYES

2005-05-24 Thread Tieum
Le Lundi 23 Mai 2005 06:09, vous avez écrit : > >1) my imap folders are scanned everyday some for HAM some for SPAM, everyday ssa-learn tells it learned from all messages although some are not new > That's weird. Is your bayes_seen file getting deleted? It does not seem so > >2) some of my m

Re: Problems with BAYES

2005-05-22 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:20 AM 5/21/2005, Tieum wrote: I use spamassain behind amavisd-new. I get two prblems with BAYES: 1) my imap folders are scanned everyday some for HAM some for SPAM, everyda= y=20 ssa-learn tells it learned from all messages although some are not new That's weird. Is your bayes_seen file

Problems with BAYES

2005-05-21 Thread Tieum
Hello, I use spamassain behind amavisd-new. I get two prblems with BAYES: 1) my imap folders are scanned everyday some for HAM some for SPAM, everyday ssa-learn tells it learned from all messages although some are not new 2) some of my messages are checked for BAYES (and therefore have BAYES

problems with bayes

2005-05-10 Thread Bill Omer
Hello list I am having an issue with bayes. I'm using MailScanner which invokes Mail:SpamAssassin (a mix of 3.0.3 and 3.0.2). This is being ran off an LVS cluster consisting of 3 real servers. I have been able to get bayes to use MySQL so all the nodes can share the same bayes db. This has bee

Re: Still "fishy" problems with bayes expiry in SA 3.0

2004-10-09 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Justin Mason wrote on Fri, 08 Oct 2004 09:39:15 -0700: > So you wind up with a very big, but unexpirable, db? yes. I can expire it with the trick mentioned, but then it blows most of the db. And the next expire fails again until I play other tricks or wait long enough. F.i. I can dump the stuff

Re: Still "fishy" problems with bayes expiry in SA 3.0

2004-10-08 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kai Schaetzl writes: > The problem seems to exists on all of our Bayes databases and I think the > cause is not "bad" data, but simply the way the SA expiry algorithm works. > There are no negative atimes or atimes in the future. If the database >

Still "fishy" problems with bayes expiry in SA 3.0

2004-10-08 Thread Kai Schaetzl
The problem seems to exists on all of our Bayes databases and I think the cause is not "bad" data, but simply the way the SA expiry algorithm works. There are no negative atimes or atimes in the future. If the database contains tokens from a wide time range it's not able to calculate a reasonab