Re: questions on spamassassin

2020-09-05 Thread Dave Funk
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020, Rajesh M wrote: dear friends, had a few questions 1) what is the sequence based on which the rules are processed ? is there any documentation on this ? how is the rule number example 20_dnsbl_tests.cf or 25_uribl.cf related to the sequence of rule processing ? Are you a

Re: questions on spamassassin

2020-09-05 Thread John Hardin
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020, Rajesh M wrote: how is the rule number example 20_dnsbl_tests.cf or 25_uribl.cf related to the sequence of rule processing ? It doesn't affect processing, but it does affect configuration. The rules files are parsed in filename-sort order, so if there are multiple defin

Re: questions on spamassassin

2020-09-05 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Hi Rajesh, I believe that the ShortCircuit feature is what you want which along with the priority level helps controls the order of rules.  https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_Shortcircuit.html Beyond that, the order they run is complicated depending on the typ

questions on spamassassin

2020-09-05 Thread Rajesh M
dear friends, had a few questions 1) what is the sequence based on which the rules are processed ? is there any documentation on this ? how is the rule number example 20_dnsbl_tests.cf or 25_uribl.cf related to the sequence of rule processing ? 2) is there a way by which if a specific rule is

Re: Questions on Spamassassin deployment

2004-11-04 Thread Kevin W. Gagel
rg Subject: Questions on Spamassassin deployment Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:57:26 -0600 > Greetings all: > > I am looking for feedback and constructive criticism on how our > organization is looking to deploy SpamAssassin. The solution we are > looking for will only need to filt

Questions on Spamassassin deployment

2004-11-03 Thread Matt Goli
Greetings all: I am looking for feedback and constructive criticism on how our organization is looking to deploy SpamAssassin. The solution we are looking for will only need to filter e-mail for virus and spam because all user mailboxes are currently stored on an Exchange 2000 server. Here is