On 23/10/2010 5:47 PM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:28:38 -0230
Lawrence @ Rogerslawrencewilli...@nl.rogers.com wrote:
Hello all,
I noticed recently that our users are getting spam with the subject
similar to the following:
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 16:05 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
I have settled on the following as it's more specific and less prone to
FPs (I can't think of any possibilities right now)
header __LOCAL_SUBJECT_SPAMMY Subject =~ /^[0-9a-zA-Z,.+]{42,}$/
meta LOCAL_SUBJECT_SPAMMY1
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:08 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 16:05 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
I have settled on the following as it's more specific and less prone to
FPs (I can't think of any possibilities right now)
header __LOCAL_SUBJECT_SPAMMY Subject =~
Hello all,
I noticed recently that our users are getting spam with the subject
similar to the following:
SehxpyNaturalRedheaddFayeReaganHasHerFirstLesbianExperienceWithBrunet
SpamAssassin seems to be having a hard time determining whether it is
spam or not because it appears as one long
On 23/10/2010 2:28 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
Hello all,
I noticed recently that our users are getting spam with the subject
similar to the following:
SehxpyNaturalRedheaddFayeReaganHasHerFirstLesbianExperienceWithBrunet
SpamAssassin seems to be having a hard time determining whether it
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 15:36 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 23/10/2010 2:28 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
In all cases, the subject contains no spaces (to prevent detection I
would think) and is longer than 62 characters (not sure why they do
this, but it is true in every sample I've
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:28:38 -0230
Lawrence @ Rogers lawrencewilli...@nl.rogers.com wrote:
Hello all,
I noticed recently that our users are getting spam with the subject
similar to the following:
SehxpyNaturalRedheaddFayeReaganHasHerFirstLesbianExperienceWithBrunet
I got some of these
