Having process load issues, I found that removing my two sa-blacklist
rules took care of it. If fact, very good processing times now that
they're gone. My question is, what I'm I missing? Spam filtering is
doing a fine job since changes applied 24 hours ago.
I run Postfix 2.2.8 with a
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Having process load issues, I found that removing my two sa-blacklist
> rules took care of it. If fact, very good processing times now that
> they're gone. My question is, what I'm I missing? Spam filtering is
> doing a fine job since change
I had a look if something changed on
http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/
but obviously the information there is quite old: If I download the "sa-
blacklist.current.reject", it has a version of April: 200904171539
while my last rsync version is 200910142031
Any chance for a fix
p://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/random.current.cf
CF_FILE=random.current.cf
CF_NAME=William Stearn's RANDOM WORD Ruleset
PARSE_NEW_VER_SCRIPT=grep -i '^#release' | tail -1
CF_MUNGE_SCRIPT=
Old random.current.cf already existed
in /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour...
Retrievin
ct to rsync.sa-blacklist.stearns.org: Connection
> timed out (110)
do you use it at postfix level as regex filter?
> So I had a look if something changed on
> http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/
> but obviously the information there is quite old: If I download the "
ist.stearns.org: Connection
> timed out (110)
>
> So I had a look if something changed on
> http://www.sa-blacklist.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/
> but obviously the information there is quite old: If I download the "sa-
> blacklist.current.reject", it has a version of A
On Samstag, 21. November 2009 Matt Kettler wrote:
> SA-blacklist and sa-blacklist-uri are both dead as far as use within
> SpamAssassin goes.
Thank you for your answer, Matt. I have to apologize, I forgot to
mention that I do not use that list in SA, for the reasons you listed.
Instead,
this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/SA-Blacklist-for-Display-Names--tp27420107p27420107.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 05:13 -0800, Daniel R. wrote:
> Hi All,
> we get a lot of Spam with some bad Words in the Display name of the sender.
> With the blacklist_from command it is possible to filter by email-address,
> but what is the right notation for filtering the display name of the sender?
>
or
URIDNSBL SpamAssassin plugins, or any other software that can
check message body domains against a name-based RBL. Data for the
second SURBL ws.surbl.org comes from the domains in Bill Stearns'
SpamAssassin blacklist: sa-blacklist. This is a large list of
spam domains, including those found in
Good day, all,
(Summary - the sa-blacklist content is moving to new machines. If
you're downloading any of the 15 versions of this list, you'll need to
change the hostname you use in your download; see "What you need to do"
below for instructions.)
I had a chat w
William Stearns wrote:
Good day, all,
(Summary - the sa-blacklist content is moving to new machines. If
you're downloading any of the 15 versions of this list, you'll need to
change the hostname you use in your download; see "What you need to
do" below for instru
Good afternoon, Chris,
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Chris Thielen wrote:
William Stearns wrote:
(Summary - the sa-blacklist content is moving to new machines. If
you're downloading any of the 15 versions of this list, you'll need to
change the hostname you use in your download; see
Good evening, all,
This is a (shortened) repost of a sincere request to anyone using
any of the sa-blacklist files. The URLs to those files have changed;
please update your URLs in any automated download scripts. if you're
using RulesDuJour, please get the latest version as Chri
2 times on THAT day!
The daily average is normally 400.
I'm using the rule /etc/mail/spamassassin/65_sa-blacklist.cf with a daily
(04hAM) update from
URL=http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current
Of course, the entries of this file is NOW correct
I'm assuming that,
15 matches
Mail list logo
