On Apr 21, 2007, at 11:49 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Try adding a -D to sa-learn.. if it's lock contention, you should
see a bunch of messages about it waiting for the lock.
i did this earlier (after some mucking about with file tracing tools)
and found that most of the wait seems to be in two
Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
On Apr 21, 2007, at 11:49 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Try adding a -D to sa-learn.. if it's lock contention, you should see
a bunch of messages about it waiting for the lock.
i did this earlier (after some mucking about with file tracing tools)
and found that most of the
On Apr 22, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
You don't have sa-blacklist, do you?
no, but i had a whitelist with almost 5,000 entries
-faisal
On Apr 21, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
2. which way do i learn it.
Erm, if it's spam, learn it as spam.. if it's nonspam, learn it as
nonspam. What's the problem here?
i have a program looking through for untrained messages and deciding
what to train them as. alternatively, i
Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
On Apr 21, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
2. which way do i learn it.
Erm, if it's spam, learn it as spam.. if it's nonspam, learn it as
nonspam. What's the problem here?
i have a program looking through for untrained messages and deciding
what to train them
On Apr 21, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Ok, but how does knowing what SA learned it as help? It doesn't.
Figure out what to train as, and train.
it helps in that i can automatically iterate over some or all of my
mail folders on a regular basis, selectively retraining *if*:
a)
Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
On Apr 21, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Ok, but how does knowing what SA learned it as help? It doesn't.
Figure out what to train as, and train.
it helps in that i can automatically iterate over some or all of my
mail folders on a regular basis, selectively
Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
if sa-learn already does this internally then it's doing it rather
inefficiently. 20 seconds to pull a message id and compare it against
the db (berkeleydb, fwiw)?
Ok, I just did some testing. Something is *VERY* wrong with your
system.. Are you running out of ram and
On Apr 21, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
time sa-learn on it, and feed it the WHOLE DIRECTORY at once. Do not
iterate messages, do not specify filenames, just give sa-learn the
name
of the directory.
Doing this on a directory with 6 messages takes about a second more
than doing it
On Apr 21, 2007, at 2:11 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Ok, I just did some testing. Something is *VERY* wrong with your
system.. Are you running out of ram and swapping?
Hrm. top currently reports 123mb free (out of 2g physical, with some
swapping. sa-learn has a 62M RSS. This is a shared
Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
On Apr 21, 2007, at 2:11 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Ok, I just did some testing. Something is *VERY* wrong with your
system.. Are you running out of ram and swapping?
Hrm. top currently reports 123mb free (out of 2g physical, with some
swapping. sa-learn has a 62M RSS.
Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:34 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Try to learn it, if it comes back with something to the affect of:
learned from 0 messages, processed 1.. then it's already been learned.
First, sorry for taking so long to get back to you.. I've been absurdly
busy at work
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 00:17, Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:34 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Try to learn it, if it comes back with something to the affect of:
learned from 0 messages, processed 1.. then it's already been
learned.
this seems to be the common suggestion.
it
Phil Barnett wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 00:17, Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:34 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Try to learn it, if it comes back with something to the affect of:
learned from 0 messages, processed 1.. then it's already been
learned.
this seems to be the common
Faisal -- could you open an enhancement request on the SpamAssassin
bugzilla? This would be a useful feature.
--j.
Faisal N Jawdat writes:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:34 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Try to learn it, if it comes back with something to the affect of:
learned from 0 messages, processed
Is there an easy way to tell if sa-learn has learned a given message
before?
-faisal
Faisal N Jawdat wrote:
Is there an easy way to tell if sa-learn has learned a given message
before?
Try to learn it, if it comes back with something to the affect of:
learned from 0 messages, processed 1.. then it's already been learned.
On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:34 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Try to learn it, if it comes back with something to the affect of:
learned from 0 messages, processed 1.. then it's already been
learned.
this seems to be the common suggestion.
it has a couple drawbacks, as i see it:
1. it's relatively
18 matches
Mail list logo
