On 6-May-2009, at 06:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
To determine if a mail already has been learned, SA needs to have a
look
at the mail.
On 06.05.09 17:34, LuKreme wrote:
Mightn't it be helpful if it could keep a cache of filenames?
Useless, they can change. I hope that SA reads only
Yes, the learn client does not try to keep up with what it has done, or not
done, before - that is handled by the server (the Bayes engine).
I believe there is no reasonable way for the client to achieve this, anyway -
it cannot reliably modify your maildir in such a way that it can be assured
I have one user on my system who receives a LOT of spam. This is
intentional as that user is set to never discard email once it is
received. I scan the spam and let it auto-expire out of the IMAP
folder after 7 days. The trouble is, in those 7 days, the folder
usually grows to between
On Wed, 6 May 2009 01:43:08 -0600
ɹןʇnqן lbut...@covisp.net wrote:
The trouble appears to me to be that sa-learn has no concept of
whether or not it has learned a message or not.
It does, they are stored in the bayes_seen file if you are using
db storage.
Hi,
processes. It has even, on occasion, necessitated a reboot when i could not
get the system to kill the process. I've taken to trying to scan it daily and
manually delete the spam, but that's not always possible.
This hint might be totally wrong, but last time I saw such a behavior it
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 01:43 -0600, ɹןʇnqן wrote:
The trouble appears to me to be that sa-learn has no concept of
whether or not it has learned a message or not. Since all IMAP
messages are stored with unique names, is there some easy way to
create a cache of the messages it has checked
On 6-May-2009, at 07:13, RW wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 01:43:08 -0600
ɹןʇnqן lbut...@covisp.net wrote:
The trouble appears to me to be that sa-learn has no concept of
whether or not it has learned a message or not.
It does, they are stored in the bayes_seen file if you are using
db storage.
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:23 -0500, LuKreme wrote:
It does, they are stored in the bayes_seen file if you are using
db storage.
It odes int aht it doesn't relearn then, but it doesn't in terms of
processing them. Lemme explain.
I already explained in this very thread why there is *no*
On 6-May-2009, at 06:50, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 01:43 -0600, ɹןʇnqן wrote:
The trouble appears to me to be that sa-learn has no concept of
whether or not it has learned a message or not. Since all IMAP
messages are stored with unique names, is there some easy way to
Awesome. So I mentioned it twice in this thread, once each before your
follow-ups, and you keep on ignoring and arguing. Which part of of auto-
learning and before local delivery is unclear to you?
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 17:34 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 6-May-2009, at 06:50, Karsten Bräckelmann
On 6-May-2009, at 19:46, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Awesome. So I mentioned it twice in this thread, once each before your
follow-ups, and you keep on ignoring and arguing. Which part of of
auto-
learning and before local delivery is unclear to you?
This has nothing to do with either
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 19:55 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 6-May-2009, at 19:46, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Awesome. So I mentioned it twice in this thread, once each before your
follow-ups, and you keep on ignoring and arguing. Which part of of auto-
learning and before local delivery is unclear
12 matches
Mail list logo
