Obantec Support wrote:
SA3.0.0 lowest seen 1.5
(virus snipped)
That's not spam, it's a virus...
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ Example Spam (trimmed to the basics) ]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: You visit illegal websites
Dear Sir/Madam,
we have logged your IP-address on more than 30 illegal Websites.
Important:
Please answer
@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: seeing a few new spams with low SA scoring
From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ Example Spam (trimmed to the basics) ]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: You visit illegal websites
Dear
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:27:07PM -, Obantec Support wrote:
ok so its a virus on some else's PC but i see quite a few incoming in the
last week. my AV dropped the attached zip.
I call my anti-virus (ClamAV via clamassassin, BTW) from
/etc/procmailrc. If it says it's a virus, it goes
From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok so its a virus on some else's PC but i see quite a few incoming
in the last week. my AV dropped the attached zip.
so SA does not trap it, should i be looking at a procmail rule to
dump the emails.
SA does not intentionally try to catch
so SA does not trap it, should i be looking at a procmail rule to dump the
emails.
Not a bad idea. If for some reason you really want to keep them around but
detect them, sare_specific or one of the similar files should catch these.
Loren
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so SA does not trap it, should i be looking at a procmail rule to dump the
emails.
Not a bad idea. If for some reason you really want to keep them around but
detect them, sare_specific or one of the similar files should catch these.
I forget what I did
