Message-Id:
Read RFC 822, pp. 44-46.
If your answer is that the latest RFC allows for it, the my reply is: my mail,
my rules, so I apply the most stringent rules.
Original Message
On 15 Jan 2023, 20:47, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.102 tagged_above=-200
Hi!
Yes, I am running SA4 and have been for probably more than a year. What
am I doing wrong that RBL checks wouldn't be checking the FQDN?
Could be several reasons but will contact you offlist.
uniabujaedung-my[.]sharepoint[.]com[.]multi[.]surbl[.]org
has address 127.0.0.64
Meaning its l
Hi,
> RBL checks for FQDN not just domains would be a good idea...
>
...
>
> I assume you are not running SA4. That does this. (And the sharepoint
> domain you have in your mail is listed on SURBL )
>
Yes, I am running SA4 and have been for probably more than a year. What am
I doing wrong th
Hello All,
RBL checks for FQDN not just domains would be a good idea...
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.102 tagged_above=-200 required=5
>tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
>DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.1, FMBLA_HELO_OUTMX=-0.01,
>FMBLA_RDNS_OUTMX=-0.0
RBL checks for FQDN not just domains would be a good idea...
Pedro.
>On Sunday, January 15, 2023 at 08:47:59 PM GMT+1, Alex
wrote:
>Hi,
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.102 tagged_above=-200 required=5
>tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
>DKIM_VALID
Alex skrev den 2023-01-15 20:47:
Hi,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.102 tagged_above=-200 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.1, FMBLA_HELO_OUTMX=-0.01,
FMBLA_RDNS_OUTMX=-0.01, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOC_CDIS_INLINE=
Hi,
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.102 tagged_above=-200 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, DMARC_PASS=-0.1, FMBLA_HELO_OUTMX=-0.01,
FMBLA_RDNS_OUTMX=-0.01, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOC_CDIS_INLINE=0.1,
LOC_FILE_SHARE_PHISH1=0.75, L