> > Is the Day Old Bread list a reliable list. I found that their DNS times
> > out a lot of times.
When DOB turned sour last year, I switched to Blaine Fleming's
spameatingmonkey.net. The list is accessible through rsync
and needs to be fed as a zone file to a local DNS.
Contact Blaine for rsync
ram wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 15:35 +1000, Con Tassios wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Chip M. wrote:
>>
>>> DOB ("Day Old Bread") had the same problem last year:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200810.mbox/%3cva.33f1.14690...@news.conactive.com%3e
>>>
>>> Wi
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 15:35 +1000, Con Tassios wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Chip M. wrote:
>
> > DOB ("Day Old Bread") had the same problem last year:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200810.mbox/%3cva.33f1.14690...@news.conactive.com%3e
> >
> > With software b
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Chip M. wrote:
> DOB ("Day Old Bread") had the same problem last year:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200810.mbox/%3cva.33f1.14690...@news.conactive.com%3e
>
> With software bugs, lightning often DOES strike twice in the same
> spot. :)
I'm
DOB ("Day Old Bread") had the same problem last year:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200810.mbox/%3cva.33f1.14690...@news.conactive.com%3e
With software bugs, lightning often DOES strike twice in the same
spot. :)
- "Chip"
Yet Another Ninja a écrit :
> On 6/14/2009 10:48 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> http://log.perl.org/2009/06/email-issues-org-blocked-now-fixed.html
>>
>> anyone know what URIBL provider this was?
>>
>> --j.
>
> Wouldn't we all have noticed if this would have been the case?
not if they use some unknow
Hi!
http://log.perl.org/2009/06/email-issues-org-blocked-now-fixed.html
anyone know what URIBL provider this was?
Wouldn't we all have noticed if this would have been the case?
Doesnt ring a bell here either, best to ask the guys who posted that?
Bye,
Raymond.
On 6/14/2009 10:48 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
http://log.perl.org/2009/06/email-issues-org-blocked-now-fixed.html
anyone know what URIBL provider this was?
--j.
Wouldn't we all have noticed if this would have been the case?
http://log.perl.org/2009/06/email-issues-org-blocked-now-fixed.html
anyone know what URIBL provider this was?
--j.