Re: some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-15 Thread Mark Martinec
> > Is the Day Old Bread list a reliable list. I found that their DNS times > > out a lot of times. When DOB turned sour last year, I switched to Blaine Fleming's spameatingmonkey.net. The list is accessible through rsync and needs to be fed as a zone file to a local DNS. Contact Blaine for rsync

Re: some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-14 Thread Bill Landry
ram wrote: > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 15:35 +1000, Con Tassios wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Chip M. wrote: >> >>> DOB ("Day Old Bread") had the same problem last year: >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200810.mbox/%3cva.33f1.14690...@news.conactive.com%3e >>> >>> Wi

Re: some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-14 Thread ram
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 15:35 +1000, Con Tassios wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Chip M. wrote: > > > DOB ("Day Old Bread") had the same problem last year: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200810.mbox/%3cva.33f1.14690...@news.conactive.com%3e > > > > With software b

Re: some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-14 Thread Con Tassios
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Chip M. wrote: > DOB ("Day Old Bread") had the same problem last year: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200810.mbox/%3cva.33f1.14690...@news.conactive.com%3e > > With software bugs, lightning often DOES strike twice in the same > spot. :) I'm

Re: some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-14 Thread Chip M.
DOB ("Day Old Bread") had the same problem last year: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200810.mbox/%3cva.33f1.14690...@news.conactive.com%3e With software bugs, lightning often DOES strike twice in the same spot. :) - "Chip"

Re: some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-14 Thread mouss
Yet Another Ninja a écrit : > On 6/14/2009 10:48 PM, Justin Mason wrote: >> http://log.perl.org/2009/06/email-issues-org-blocked-now-fixed.html >> >> anyone know what URIBL provider this was? >> >> --j. > > Wouldn't we all have noticed if this would have been the case? not if they use some unknow

Re: some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-14 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! http://log.perl.org/2009/06/email-issues-org-blocked-now-fixed.html anyone know what URIBL provider this was? Wouldn't we all have noticed if this would have been the case? Doesnt ring a bell here either, best to ask the guys who posted that? Bye, Raymond.

Re: some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-14 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 6/14/2009 10:48 PM, Justin Mason wrote: http://log.perl.org/2009/06/email-issues-org-blocked-now-fixed.html anyone know what URIBL provider this was? --j. Wouldn't we all have noticed if this would have been the case?

some URIBL accidentally listed .org?

2009-06-14 Thread Justin Mason
http://log.perl.org/2009/06/email-issues-org-blocked-now-fixed.html anyone know what URIBL provider this was? --j.