> OK, I also know there is a queue building up on the dual-core systems,
> but hardly any queueing on the single-core.
>
Sounds like some sort of resource contention issue.
Are there any parts of SA / spamd that all children access but that only
exists as a single instance?
> Quite probably, b
Per Jessen wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> On 05.11.08 12:09, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> I have a very unusual situation (I think):
>>>
>>> I am running the exact same system (it was cloned) on several
>>> single-core and dual-core systems. The only difference is in the
>>> hardware, i.e
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 05.11.08 12:09, Per Jessen wrote:
>> I have a very unusual situation (I think):
>>
>> I am running the exact same system (it was cloned) on several
>> single-core and dual-core systems. The only difference is in the
>> hardware, i.e. some systems are dual-core.
On 05.11.08 12:09, Per Jessen wrote:
> I have a very unusual situation (I think):
>
> I am running the exact same system (it was cloned) on several
> single-core and dual-core systems. The only difference is in the
> hardware, i.e. some systems are dual-core.
cloned? Do you have the same OS ker
All,
I have a very unusual situation (I think):
I am running the exact same system (it was cloned) on several
single-core and dual-core systems. The only difference is in the
hardware, i.e. some systems are dual-core.
I am running spamd with maxchild=25 (the actual number in use is
controlled
