Re: spamd running much slower than spamassassin?

2016-03-31 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 29, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Mar 28, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Bill Cole > wrote: >> On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:

Re: spamd running much slower than spamassassin?

2016-03-29 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 28, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >>> /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg >>> 7.92 real 1.85 user

Re: spamd running much slower than spamassassin?

2016-03-28 Thread Bill Cole
On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote: On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg 7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys /usr/bin/time spamc -U /var/run/spamd.sock < spam.msg 126.44 real 0.00

Re: spamd running much slower than spamassassin?

2016-03-28 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg >7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys > > /usr/bin/time spamc -U /var/run/spamd.sock < spam.msg > 126.44 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys well, it looks

spamd running much slower than spamassassin?

2016-03-24 Thread Daniel J. Luke
I recently noticed that spamd was running /much/ slower than usual. With a test message: /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg 7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys /usr/bin/time spamc -U /var/run/spamd.sock < spam.msg 126.44 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys