On Mar 29, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>> On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Mar 28, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>> /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg
>>> 7.92 real 1.85 user
On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke
wrote:
/usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg
7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys
/usr/bin/time spamc -U /var/run/spamd.sock < spam.msg
126.44 real 0.00
On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg
>7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys
>
> /usr/bin/time spamc -U /var/run/spamd.sock < spam.msg
> 126.44 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys
well, it looks
I recently noticed that spamd was running /much/ slower than usual.
With a test message:
/usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg
7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys
/usr/bin/time spamc -U /var/run/spamd.sock < spam.msg
126.44 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys