On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:03:47 -0700
@lbutlr wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2020, at 14:48, RW wrote:
> > It seems perfectly clear to me, if read carefully.
>
> The definition is clear, but the original post specifically addressed
> the lack of _DOMAIN_ being defined:
It says that _DOMAIN_ comes from the
On 18 Feb 2020, at 14:48, RW wrote:
> It seems perfectly clear to me, if read carefully.
The definition is clear, but the original post specifically addressed the lack
of _DOMAIN_ being defined:
On 18 Feb 2020, at 00:36, Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
> In my setup, the domain variable is em
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:35:18 -0700
@lbutlr wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2020, at 07:25, RW wrote:
> > It's the first match on _DOMAIN_, it stands out as being a
> > definition, and it says in simple unambiguous language where the
> > value comes from.
>
> If the OP could look up the domain in the sql
Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now spamc
is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides the point, since
whatever way spamc is called, it can only specify one -u param as the
username. However, the WIKI and Docs version of t
On 18 Feb 2020, at 07:25, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:54:22 -0700 @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> On 18 Feb 2020, at 05:30, RW wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:36:11 +0100 Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now
spamc is invoked th
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:54:22 -0700
@lbutlr wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2020, at 05:30, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:36:11 +0100 Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
> >> I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now
> >> spamc is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides
On 18 Feb 2020, at 05:30, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:36:11 +0100 Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
>> I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now
>> spamc is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides the
>> point, since whatever way spamc is called, it can onl
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 08:36:11 +0100
Guido Goluke, Majorlabel wrote:
> I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now
> spamc is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides the
> point, since whatever way spamc is called, it can only specify one -u
> param as the username.
I'm in the process of setting up my preferences through SQL. Now spamc
is invoked through a Postfix milter, but that's besides the point, since
whatever way spamc is called, it can only specify one -u param as the
username. However, the WIKI and Docs version of the proposed query use
both a _US
Is there any way to use both an SQL configuration for virtual user
preferences, but at the same time use file-based bayes databases for virtual
users?
The spamd man page for the "-virtual-config-dir" option states:
"Note that this requires that -x is used, and cannot be
comb
On 2/20/2014 3:07 PM, Wade Rossmann wrote:
I'm using SpamAssassin via MimeDefang and trying to load user
preferences in from a mySQL database. I've tried adding the
user_scores_sql_* config items in the config file, but these seem to
be ignored by everything except spamd -q. I've more or less g
I'm using SpamAssassin via MimeDefang and trying to load user
preferences in from a mySQL database. I've tried adding the
user_scores_sql_* config items in the config file, but these seem to be
ignored by everything except spamd -q. I've more or less given up on
making that work [but if someone
>
>
> Hi, I am using spamassassin and store the user preferences in
> an SQL database.
> That works for simple options, like required_hits, since this
> has a key (required_hits) and a value (5.0 for example).
> But how about preferences where the key is composed of
> multiple parts, like rewr
Hi, I am using spamassassin and store the user preferences in an SQL database.
That works for simple options, like required_hits, since this has a key
(required_hits) and a value (5.0 for example).
But how about preferences where the key is composed of multiple parts, like
rewrite_header subject
Hi
Im trying to use SQL user preferences and SQL awl.
I want my users to be able to choose whether they use awl, so in my test
setup have created a user and entered use_auto_whitelist 0 in the
userprefs table.
It seems to skip it, mentioning administrator setting, can you not set
this on a per u
15 matches
Mail list logo