On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Francesco Acchiappati wrote:
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin exited with return code 25
here it is
The only things that appear to be exposed and able to return a nonzero
return code (apart from the simple stuff like sleep and chmod) are:
test -f
On tir 16 nov 2010 14:08:21 CET, Francesco Acchiappati wrote
/var/lib/spamassassin/compiled ]; then
this dir does imho not exists, its /var/lib/spamassassin/version/compiled
unless debian have fixed it
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Il 16/11/2010 15:11, John Hardin ha scritto:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Francesco Acchiappati wrote:
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin exited with return code 25
here it is
The only things that appear to be exposed and able to return a nonzero
return code (apart from the simple stuff
Hello everyone,
i'm experiencing a strange issue everytime the crondaily runs the
spamassassin script for updating.
the error returned to me by cron daily is the following:
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin exited with return code 25
I've tried to search on this list archive and also
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:08:20 +0100
Francesco Acchiappati francesco.acchiapp...@secoges.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
i'm experiencing a strange issue everytime the crondaily runs the
spamassassin script for updating.
the error returned to me by cron daily is the following:
run-parts:
On tir 16 nov 2010 09:08:20 CET, Francesco Acchiappati wrote
the error returned to me by cron daily is the following:
run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin exited with return code 25
try doing what writed in that cron from shell and add -D to args
sa-update -D
what are being in shell here
On tir 16 nov 2010 12:48:48 CET, RW wrote
I don't think that cron.daily/spamassassin is part of SA - it's
probably specific to your OS or distribution. Perhaps you could post it.
or delete it to get rid of the problem :)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Il 16/11/2010 12:48, RW ha scritto:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:08:20 +0100
Francesco Acchiappatifrancesco.acchiapp...@secoges.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
i'm experiencing a strange issue everytime the crondaily runs the
spamassassin script for updating.
the error returned to me by cron daily
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:54 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
/var/lib/spamassassin/compiled ]; then
this dir does imho not exists, its /var/lib/spamassassin/version/compiled
Nope, the path is correct. See man sa-compile for yourself.
--updatedir=path Directory to place updates
(default:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Francesco Acchiappati wrote:
Il 16/11/2010 15:11, John Hardin ha scritto:
I'd suggest the most likely problem is sa-compile is failing for some
reason. Try running it interactively.
You could run this:
bash -x /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin 21 | tee /tmp/log.txt
As
Il 16/11/2010 17:27, John Hardin ha scritto:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Francesco Acchiappati wrote:
Il 16/11/2010 15:11, John Hardin ha scritto:
I'd suggest the most likely problem is sa-compile is failing for some
reason. Try running it interactively.
You could run this:
bash -x
Francesco Acchiappati wrote:
John Hardin ha scritto:
You also might want to run sa-compile manually and see what happens.
/bin/sh: cc: command not found
make: *** [body_0.o] Error 127
command failed: exit 2
heh... i think this may be the reason.. sa-compile returns this
error.. now i
On tir 16 nov 2010 17:00:50 CET, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote
Nope, the path is correct. See man sa-compile for yourself.
--updatedir=path Directory to place updates
(default: /var/lib/spamassassin/compiled/perlversion/version)
yep i lost it here, compiled is in that dir even on gentoo,
On tir 16 nov 2010 17:51:21 CET, Francesco Acchiappati wrote
heh... i think this may be the reason.. sa-compile returns this
error.. now i have to figure out how a dependency like cc is missing
on my system... mmm this will be a loong night..
thank you very much to everyone who helped
Benny Pedersen wrote:
gcc is not default installed in debian
bug it as a missing dependice for spamassassin
It is only a Recommends: relationship because it isn't required. It
is only required if you use the compiled rules. And that is optional.
So gcc isn't required but only optional.
Bob
15 matches
Mail list logo