Hi,
> It still is spawning a Perl process per message. You can do away with
> that processing hog, if you use the add_header rule I mentioned before
> and have SA do it instead.
You may be right. I'll have to investigate doing this for this
specific user only. Thanks for the info.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 14:45 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> > That sounds overly complicated and like a lot of wasted cycles. Calling
> > a Perl script for each message? What you just described sounds a hell of
> > lot like this light-weight SA configuration:
>
> Yes, I should have mentioned that it
Hi,
> That sounds overly complicated and like a lot of wasted cycles. Calling
> a Perl script for each message? What you just described sounds a hell of
> lot like this light-weight SA configuration:
Yes, I should have mentioned that it is a copy of the mail that users
receive and only visible by
From: "Jason Bertoch"
Sent: Thursday, 2009/October/08 09:01
Shane Webster wrote:
Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
subject would state [Potential Spam],
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, LuKreme wrote:
You can do this easily with procmail.
DOGPILE!
:)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 13:47 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> We do something similar here using a procmail/formail script which
> calls a perl script to match on X-Spam-Status then rewrite the subject
> to include the bayes score prepended to the subject.
*boggle*
That sounds overly complicated and
On 8-Oct-2009, at 09:39, Shane Webster wrote:
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the
value
of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given
the
subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it
is
[SPAM] if it was greater th
On tor 08 okt 2009 19:26:10 CEST, Shane Webster wrote
I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
handle int(),
try using:
X-Spam-Level
header so
--
xpoint
Hi,
> I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
> handle int(), so I would have to build a filter for all possible number
> combinations, but if I could just get SA to do the basic math for me and
> write a header or subject I can filter off of that.
We do something s
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Shane Webster wrote:
I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
handle int(), so I would have to build a filter for all possible number
combinations,
You could check the asterisks in X-Spam-Level:
if match X-Spam-Level: **
subject -> [ULTRA
On Thursday 08 October 2009 19:26:10 Shane Webster wrote:
> I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
> handle int(), so I would have to build a filter for all possible number
> combinations, but if I could just get SA to do the basic math for me and
> write a header or
I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
handle int(), so I would have to build a filter for all possible number
combinations, but if I could just get SA to do the basic math for me and
write a header or subject I can filter off of that.
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 20:21 +0300
> Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
>
> I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject
> based on the value of the score. A example of this would
> be if a score of 4.0 was given the subject would state
> [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it is
> [SPAM] if it was greater then 10.0 it w
I will look into doing this, thank you.
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 19:02 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:01 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > Shane Webster wrote:
> > > I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
> > > of the score. A example of t
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:01 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> Shane Webster wrote:
> > I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
> > of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
> > subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 t
To be honest it sounds like you want MailScanner.
Eddie Hallahan
Enterprise Management Consulting
www.emcuk.com
Enterprise Management Consulting is a company registered in England and Wales
with company number 3134544. VAT registration number is 681038440.
Shane Webster wrote:
> Spamassassin
Shane Webster wrote:
Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it is
[SPAM] if it was greater then
Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it is
[SPAM] if it was greater then 10.0 it would be [SUPER
RW googlemail.com> writes:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:00:03 + (UTC)
> Ray misinformation.org> wrote:
> > * How do I determine what the current SA config is?
>
> The locations where spamassassin looks for configuration are listed in
> the main manpage.
I managed to find the config directory on
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:00:03 + (UTC)
Ray wrote:
> However, SA currently appears to be making spam
> judgement and to be bayes autolearning. (A reasonable default setup
> from the hosting provider.)
>
> * How do I determine what the current SA config is?
The locations where spamassassin loo
I just moved to a new hosting provider who has Spamassassin 3.2.4 running (on
some kind of Linux, 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) and I'm otherwise unfamiliar with SA.
I'd like some degree of control over what SA is doing, but config for this is
proving confusing for me.
Ideally if I could get SA just to mark
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 3:40 PM
To: Terry Miller
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exiscan + subject rewrite not working
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Terry Miller wrote:
> I looked this up and can't see where I'm doing anything wrong, but the
>
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Terry Miller wrote:
> I looked this up and can't see where I'm doing anything wrong, but the
> subject is not being rewritten.
You should probably ask this question on the exim-users list. I suspect
(but I am not certain) that exiscan doesn't support the message rewrite
parts
I looked this up and can't see where I'm doing anything wrong, but the
subject is not being rewritten.
Some relevant data:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
# How many hits before a message is considered spam.
required_score 3.0
# Change the subject of suspected spam
rewrite_header Subject *S
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Michael Barnes wrote:
I prefer:
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM-Score-_HITS_]
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of Westchester
http://www.westnet.com/
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:43:23PM -0400, Robert Swan wrote:
> Hello all, I am wondering if anyone knows how to get the score of the
> SPAM in the subject line with the rewrite. Right now I rewrite the
> subject line with [SPAM] at the beginning but it would be helpful to
> see the score in the sam
Robert Swan wrote:
Hello all, I am wondering if anyone knows how to get the score of the
SPAM in the subject line with the rewrite. Right now I rewrite the
subject line with [SPAM] at the beginning but it would be helpful to see
the score in the same place. Also I attach the original e-mail an
Hello all, I am wondering if anyone knows how to get the
score of the SPAM in the subject line with the rewrite. Right now I rewrite the
subject line with [SPAM] at the beginning but it would be helpful to see the
score in the same place. Also I attach the original e-mail and I use spamass
Steve Dimoff wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have in the SA conf:
>
> subject_tag [SPAM]
>
> We are running SA 2.63
>
> Since today, we haven't had a problem with the rewrite, and today a
> message came in as:
>
> [SPAM-P]
>
> ...I'm confused... of where the -P came from. Has anyone seen this
>
Steve Dimoff wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have in the SA conf:
>
> subject_tag [SPAM]
>
> We are running SA 2.63
Warning: You have a DoS vulnerability in your version of SA. This vulnerability
is in the mime parser, and can be exploited remotely by sending you a malformed
message. Upgrade to 2.
Folks,
We have in the SA conf:
subject_tag [SPAM]
We are running SA 2.63
Since today, we haven't had a problem with the rewrite, and today a message
came in as:
[SPAM-P]
...I'm confused... of where the -P came from. Has anyone seen this before?
Or know why?
Thanks,
Steve
1:46 PM
To: SpamAssassin (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Subject Rewrite not working
Elias Arends wrote:
> Platform: Solaris 8
> MTA: Postfix 2.1.5
> Software: SpamAssassin 2.64
> SQL: MySQL 4.0.21
>
> I have fixed the issue with spamd querying MySQL with the "-u" option.
> Tha
On fredag 19 november 2004, 18:45, Jim Maul wrote:
> I can not believe the number of times this question is asked on the
> list
>
> :( I guess it shows how many people dont read the documentation and
>
> dont search the archives.
Yeah... I just tried to add this as an entry to the main FAQ Wiki
Elias Arends wrote:
Platform: Solaris 8
MTA: Postfix 2.1.5
Software: SpamAssassin 2.64
SQL: MySQL 4.0.21
I have fixed the issue with spamd querying MySQL with the "-u" option.
Thanks. Now I have another problem. It seems that incoming spam is tagged
properly in the headers, but the subject is not b
Platform: Solaris 8
MTA: Postfix 2.1.5
Software: SpamAssassin 2.64
SQL: MySQL 4.0.21
I have fixed the issue with spamd querying MySQL with the "-u" option.
Thanks. Now I have another problem. It seems that incoming spam is tagged
properly in the headers, but the subject is not being edited. Here a
35 matches
Mail list logo
