Michael Parker wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 06:09:32PM +0200, Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Thanks. This shouldn't be all that much changes. Is there a patch for
getting this in 3.0.3?
Search bugzilla, there was a review patch for the 3.0 tree but it
never got enough votes to go in so I
Hi. Is it possible to keep my system-wide AWL setup when using 'spamc -u
recipient' with user preference and AWL stored in SQL?
I currently have a system-wide AWL of more than a million rows that it
would be a pity to loose.
.. or should I switch to personal AWL's anyway?
Arvinn
Hi. Is it possible to keep my system-wide AWL setup when
using 'spamc -u recipient' with user preference and AWL stored in
SQL?
Yes. Follow the instructions in the readme files.
for user prefs and mysql see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL
Philipp
Philipp Snizek wrote:
Hi. Is it possible to keep my system-wide AWL setup when
using 'spamc -u recipient' with user preference and AWL stored in
SQL?
Yes. Follow the instructions in the readme files.
for user prefs and mysql see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL
Philipp
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Yes. Follow the instructions in the readme files.
for user prefs and mysql see
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL
Allready read it. System-wide AWL is not disucussed there, is it?
Probably not, there is a
Michael Parker wrote:
Probably not, there is a concept in 3.1 that allows you to do
systemwide or groupwide AWL dbs in SQL, similar to how you can
currently do it in Bayes (via override_username).
Michael
Thanks. This shouldn't be all that much changes. Is there a patch for
getting this in
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 06:09:32PM +0200, Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Thanks. This shouldn't be all that much changes. Is there a patch for
getting this in 3.0.3?
Search bugzilla, there was a review patch for the 3.0 tree but it
never got enough votes to go in so I dropped it. I think it
