concerned that if nobody is looking for feedback, BSP
will be frequently used by spammers and I am now contemplating adding a
slightly positive score for this rule.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/where-to-report-violations-of-RCVD_IN_BSP--tp19518524p19614580.html
Sent from
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> yes, I can set a positive score for RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED rules (I
>> have!) Without it, lots of spam would get through with the default
>> -4.3 score.
>>
>
-4.3 is STILL way to high a credit. If the email typically scores 10 or
higher, and you need the -4.3 to drag i
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> yes, I can set a positive score for RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED rules (I
> have!) Without it, lots of spam would get through with the default
> -4.3 score.
>
> but if the spammer sends to our generic web contact address (found by
> harvesting our web pages), shouldn't the company
yes, I can set a positive score for RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED rules (I have!)
Without it, lots of spam would get through with the default -4.3 score.
but if the spammer sends to our generic web contact address (found by
harvesting our web pages), shouldn't the company who gets paid to 'bond'
them un
