Re: why this spam has a negative score?

2006-11-01 Thread Alan Premselaar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I edit my setting to: > > whitelist_from_rcvd * fw.muvalmez.cz > > the spam with negative score is coming through spamassassin again > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006

Re[4]: why this spam has a negative score?

2006-11-01 Thread m . donicova
I edit my setting to: whitelist_from_rcvd * fw.muvalmez.cz the spam with negative score is coming through spamassassin again Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on fw.muvalmez.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-80.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DC_GI

Re: Re[2]: why this spam has a negative score?

2006-11-01 Thread Nigel Frankcom
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:56:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Dobrý den, >24. ríjna 2006, 8:05:06, napsal jste: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list: >>> So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain? > >> I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users. >> Afterall

Re: Re[2]: why this spam has a negative score?

2006-11-01 Thread Nigel Frankcom
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:56:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Dobrý den, >24. ríjna 2006, 8:05:06, napsal jste: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list: >>> So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain? > >> I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users. >> Afterall

Re[2]: why this spam has a negative score?

2006-10-31 Thread m . donicova
Dobrý den, 24. ríjna 2006, 8:05:06, napsal jste: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list: >> So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain? > I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users. > Afterall, if you have to whitelist them to avoid their messages being > mark

Re: why this spam has a negative score?

2006-10-24 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list: So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain? I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users. Afterall, if you have to whitelist them to avoid their messages being marked as spam, what do you expect is going to happen when the

Re: why this spam has a negative score?

2006-10-23 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I´m newbee to Spamassassin I´ve install Spamassassin 3.1.5 a some spam are§not marked as a spam. Whatś wrong in my settings of spamassassin Especially this header: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on fw.muva

Re: why this spam has a negative score?

2006-10-23 Thread M.Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I´m newbee to Spamassassin I´ve install Spamassassin 3.1.5 a some spam are§not marked as a spam. Whatś wrong in my settings of spamassassin Especially this header: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on fw.muva

why this spam has a negative score?

2006-10-23 Thread m . donicova
Hi all, I´m newbee to Spamassassin I´ve install Spamassassin 3.1.5 a some spam are§not marked as a spam. Whatś wrong in my settings of spamassassin Especially this header: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on fw.muvalmez.cz X-Spam-Status: No,