Am 29.08.2014 um 02:29 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 01:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> You can easily run RBL tests against IPs from within the local network
> and treat them like any other sending SMTP client, by (a) excluding
> them from the appropriate *_networks setti
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 01:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 29.08.2014 um 01:51 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> > On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 01:06 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > the question was just "how can i enforce RBL tests inside the own LAN"
> >
> > RBL tests cannot be enforced. Internal and
Am 29.08.2014 um 01:51 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 01:06 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> the question was just "how can i enforce RBL tests inside the own LAN"
>
>> the question was just "how can i enforce RBL tests inside the own LAN"
>
>> the question was just "how can
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 01:06 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> the question was just "how can i enforce RBL tests inside the own LAN"
> the question was just "how can i enforce RBL tests inside the own LAN"
> the question was just "how can i enforce RBL tests inside the own LAN"
RBL tests cannot be e
Am 29.08.2014 um 00:57 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
>> the simple answer to my question would have been "no, in no case SA does
>> any RBL check if the client is from the same network range and there is
>> no way to change that temporary even for development" [...]
>
> That would have been simpler
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 00:22 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> the simple answer to my question would have been "no, in no case SA does
> any RBL check if the client is from the same network range and there is
> no way to change that temporary even for development" [...]
That would have been simpler in
besides that the setup is now in production
Am 27.08.2014 um 03:48 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> Again: Craft your samples to match real-life (production) environment.
> Do not configure or try to fake an environment that will not match
> production later. It won't work.
>
> You want to configur
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 03:01 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > If it's internal, it's internal. There is a reason you are setting up
> > lastexternal DNSxL rules.
>
> the intention is to handle the internal IP like it would be external
Again: Craft your samples to match real-life (production) enviro
Am 27.08.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Karsten Bräckelmann:
> On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 01:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> below the stdout/sterr of following script filtered for "dns"
>> so the lists are asked, but the question remains why that
>> don't happen from a IP in the same network
>
> Nope, no R
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 01:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> below the stdout/sterr of following script filtered for "dns"
> so the lists are asked, but the question remains why that
> don't happen from a IP in the same network
Nope, no RBL queries. See below.
> in the meantime there are a lot of "c
Am 26.08.2014 um 22:23 schrieb Matthias Leisi:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> spamc -your_normal_spamc_options >
>> are we really talking about the same?
>> that won't involve the network
>
> You need a full message, include any Received: etc headers, as it
> woul
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> spamc -your_normal_spamc_options
> are we really talking about the same?
> that won't involve the network
You need a full message, include any Received: etc headers, as it
would appear on your MTA when it would pass it on to spamc (or
wha
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 21:25 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 26.08.2014 um 21:08 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
> > Under the same directory as spamass-milter run:
> >
> > spamc -your_normal_spamc_options
> are we really talking about the same?
> that won't involve the network
>
Of course it will.
Am 26.08.2014 um 21:08 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
> On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 20:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2014 um 18:11 schrieb Axb:
>>> On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
they are *not* i sepecially added the following lines
to prevent the automatic adding to "trus
Le 26/08/2014 21:03, Reindl Harald a écrit :
i just don't know how to do that with the setup and mailflow
by just start "spamassassin -D dns" which runs the process
but how to get the mail there?
You need a copy of the message as a text file on your SA machine, then
you simply run, from the co
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 20:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.08.2014 um 18:11 schrieb Axb:
> > On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> they are *not* i sepecially added the following lines
> >> to prevent the automatic adding to "trusted_networks"
> >> since the IP range is outside
Am 26.08.2014 um 20:29 schrieb Axb:
> On 08/26/2014 08:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 26.08.2014 um 18:11 schrieb Axb:
>>> On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
they are *not* i sepecially added the following lines
to prevent the automatic adding to "trusted_networks"
On 08/26/2014 08:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.08.2014 um 18:11 schrieb Axb:
On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
they are *not* i sepecially added the following lines
to prevent the automatic adding to "trusted_networks"
since the IP range is outside
clear_trusted_networks
trust
Am 26.08.2014 um 18:11 schrieb Axb:
> On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> they are *not* i sepecially added the following lines
>> to prevent the automatic adding to "trusted_networks"
>> since the IP range is outside
>>
>> clear_trusted_networks
>> trusted_networks 192.168.168.0/24
>
On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
they are*not* i sepecially added the following lines
to prevent the automatic adding to "trusted_networks"
since the IP range is outside
clear_trusted_networks
trusted_networks 192.168.168.0/24
there was no trust at all in the headers and no
hint wh
Am 26.08.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Axb:
> On 08/26/2014 05:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2014 um 17:18 schrieb Axb:
>>> On 08/26/2014 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
header RCVD_IN_RP_TLDNS1 eval:check_rbl('tldns1-lastexternal',
'dnswl.thelounge.net.')
describe RCVD_IN_RP_TL
Am 26.08.2014 um 17:18 schrieb Axb:
> On 08/26/2014 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> header RCVD_IN_RP_TLDNS1 eval:check_rbl('tldns1-lastexternal',
>> 'dnswl.thelounge.net.')
>> describe RCVD_IN_RP_TLDNS1 Custom DNSBL/DNSWL
>> tflags RCVD_IN_RP_TLDNS1 net
>> scoreRCVD_IN_RP_TLDNS1 -5
>>
On 08/26/2014 05:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.08.2014 um 17:18 schrieb Axb:
On 08/26/2014 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
header RCVD_IN_RP_TLDNS1 eval:check_rbl('tldns1-lastexternal',
'dnswl.thelounge.net.')
describe RCVD_IN_RP_TLDNS1 Custom DNSBL/DNSWL
tflags RCVD_IN_RP_TLDNS1 net
s
On 08/26/2014 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.08.2014 um 15:54 schrieb Axb:
On 08/26/2014 03:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.08.2014 um 14:25 schrieb Joe Quinn:
On 8/26/2014 8:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
sadly the Wiki don't refer to check_rbl()
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Wr
Am 26.08.2014 um 15:54 schrieb Axb:
> On 08/26/2014 03:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2014 um 14:25 schrieb Joe Quinn:
>>> On 8/26/2014 8:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
sadly the Wiki don't refer to check_rbl()
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
>>> You can use
On 08/26/2014 03:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.08.2014 um 14:25 schrieb Joe Quinn:
On 8/26/2014 8:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i am tyring to write own RBL rules for blacklisting and
especially whitelisting using internal DNSBL/DNSWL but
my first try results in warnings at startup
sadly t
Am 26.08.2014 um 14:25 schrieb Joe Quinn:
> On 8/26/2014 8:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i am tyring to write own RBL rules for blacklisting and
>> especially whitelisting using internal DNSBL/DNSWL but
>> my first try results in warnings at startup
>>
>> sadly the Wiki don't refer to check_rbl(
On 8/26/2014 8:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hi
i am tyring to write own RBL rules for blacklisting and
especially whitelisting using internal DNSBL/DNSWL but
my first try results in warnings at startup
sadly the Wiki don't refer to check_rbl()
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
i
Hi
i am tyring to write own RBL rules for blacklisting and
especially whitelisting using internal DNSBL/DNSWL but
my first try results in warnings at startup
sadly the Wiki don't refer to check_rbl()
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
29 matches
Mail list logo
