Re: Question about shuffling top level directory

2010-07-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Just make sure to change the UUID if you go the svndump* route. Different repositories should have different UUIDs. Bob Archer wrote on Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:54:04 -0400: > > I have a repository structure like: > > repos/ABC/trunk/abc/src > > > > I want to remove the trunk and get the structur

Missing code merge issue...

2010-07-16 Thread Karl Krasnowsky
Since I'm using Subversion through the embedded plugin in Netbeans 6.8, I'm not sure where the finger should point, but was hoping I'd at least get some ideas on how to determine the direction from this list. During a merge process back to the trunk from a branch copy I'm getting a few conflict

RE: how to contribute feature of unknown popularity

2010-07-16 Thread Bob Archer
You might want to look at Robocopy. It is basically windows answer to rsync. BOb From: svnusert...@href.com [mailto:svnusert...@href.com] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:07 PM To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: how to contribute feature of unknown popularity Thank you very much for th

Re: Few special characters are not migrating properly from CVS to SVN

2010-07-16 Thread Andy Levy
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 07:49, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:30 AM,   wrote: >> >> Hello, >>         I'm trying to migrate my CVS repository into SVN, few things are not >> converted properly. There is a file having a special character 'Š', which is >> not converted same fro

Re: Few special characters are not migrating properly from CVS to SVN

2010-07-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:30 AM, wrote: > > Hello, >         I'm trying to migrate my CVS repository into SVN, few things are not > converted properly. There is a file having a special character 'Š', which is > not converted same from CVS to SVN. It is giving some random symbol apart > from the o

Few special characters are not migrating properly from CVS to SVN

2010-07-16 Thread suman . mainam
Hello, I'm trying to migrate my CVS repository into SVN, few things are not converted properly. There is a file having a special character 'Š', which is not converted same from CVS to SVN. It is giving some random symbol apart from the original one. How to avoid those special character

Re: Access control client error messages very poor?

2010-07-16 Thread John Beranek
On 16/07/10 11:38, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:29:46AM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >> On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >> [snip] Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked on - anythin

Re: Access control client error messages very poor?

2010-07-16 Thread John Beranek
On 16/07/10 11:38, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:29:46AM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >> On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >> [snip] Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked on - anythin

Re: Access control client error messages very poor?

2010-07-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:29:46AM +0100, John Beranek wrote: > On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote: > >> > [snip] > >> Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked on - anything? > > > > Looks like this was improved in tr

Re: Access control client error messages very poor?

2010-07-16 Thread John Beranek
On 16/07/10 09:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote: >> [snip] >> Has no-one else reported this? Is it being worked on - anything? > > Looks like this was improved in trunk ages ago, but not backported > to 1.6.x. Can you try patching a client w

Re: Access control client error messages very poor?

2010-07-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:47:48PM +0100, John Beranek wrote: > Hello all, > > I've just had a look through the mailing lists and the issue tracker for > this topic, and not found it discussed before. So, I'll start in? > > Is the current behaviour on performing SVN activities (with Neon RA) > th