Dear Ryan,
thank u ever so much for your educated answer. I have to go through the
material you
sent me and apply to our development team. We have been using a backup
like
procedure till today which has become unmanageable, as projects grow.
I hope that subversion will provide a traceable method
On Apr 14, 2011, at 01:12, Peter@locotel wrote:
Dear Ryan,
thank u ever so much for your educated answer. I have to go through the
material you
sent me and apply to our development team. We have been using a backup like
procedure till today which has become unmanageable, as projects grow.
When I merge changes in SVN, the merges work well except for the conflicts.
For some reason, the merges are frequently (but not always done twice). As an
example:
.working
.working
const int SERIALIZE_FIELDS_DATA_LENGTH = 83;
===
const int SERIALIZE_FIELDS_DATA_LENGTH = 91;
Hi Daniel,
by Using;
make install; echo $?
It does indeed exit with a 0.
Thanks.
I don;' know how - but I completely missed the subversion directory that was
created!
I possibly, simply, assumed it was from trunk.
I can also confirm from a dev-point of view,
That trunk passes all tests via
When I merge changes in SVN, the merges work well except for the
conflicts. For some reason, the merges are frequently (but not
always done twice). As an example:
.working
.working
const int SERIALIZE_FIELDS_DATA_LENGTH = 83;
===
const int SERIALIZE_FIELDS_DATA_LENGTH = 91;
Yes, that was the problem. After fixing the permissions, I initiated another
mirror operation that was able to sync everything.
The issue was that A had restricted access and a branch 'B' was created from A
for public use. Since A was missing in the mirrored branch, the mirror
operation
Hi all,
We have 5 developers, each of them has a workspace on our linux
workgroup server. The workspaces constist of working copies checked out
from our SVN repository. The workspaces have grown rather big in our
case, we have like 20 GB per developer.
That's a 100 GB worth of working
It should work.
Specifically, if you run svnsync using an authz-bound user, then you
should just see adds-with-history converted into adds-without-history.
I believe we have regression tests for such scenarios too.
If you can reproduce this (have a minimal example), please file an
issue, thanks.
Guten Tag Jan Dvorak,
am Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 um 16:16 schrieben Sie:
Which linux filesystem would you recommend?
The only one I read of with deduplication was ZFS and KQ Infotech
seems to provide a good implementation for Linux.
http://www.kqinfotech.com/content.php?id=2
Mit
Yeah, even I thought that the behavior should be same as you mentioned but I
got
svnsync: Error while replaying commit error during sync operation for that
revision.
When I checked the mirrored repository, A was missing which is correct as at
that time A had restricted access. Branch
2011/4/14 Thorsten Schöning tschoen...@am-soft.de
Guten Tag Jan Dvorak,
am Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 um 16:16 schrieben Sie:
Which linux filesystem would you recommend?
The only one I read of with deduplication was ZFS and KQ Infotech
seems to provide a good implementation for Linux.
On 14.4.2011 21:17, David Brodbeck wrote:
[...]
Be careful with ZFS deduplication. It still has some issues. Memory
usage for it is quite massive,
I was prepared for that, yes.
and there are cases of running a destroy
operation on a deduped zpool taking literally days.
I see, that's
12 matches
Mail list logo
