On Jun 6, 2011, at 15:04, Sam Theman wrote:
> I am currently running subverison 1.6.11 with apache 2.2.15
>
> I need to go to subversion 1.6.17. So I was just going to build
> subversion1.6.17 svn modules and put them into the apache2 modules directory.
>
> I tried to build subversion 1.6.17 wi
Hello,
I am currently running subverison 1.6.11 with apache 2.2.15
I need to go to subversion 1.6.17. So I was just going to build
subversion1.6.17 svn modules and put them into the apache2 modules directory.
I tried to build subversion 1.6.17 with the apr libs from apache 2.2.15 but got
an e
It's an interesting question...
You're too use to RCS. CVS, for example, uses RCS format for files,
but the files are on a remote server where no one but the CVS admin
has access. I guess ClearCase via dynamic views comes closest to what
you want. (You setup a "view", but can use the magical "@@"
Dear Subversion experts,
I am tto establish SVN server with Cyrus SASL authentification but failed to
properly set this. When using SVN repository with config/passwd
authentification then it works perfectlyworks. But I am to do more secure
authentification. I am sending you all SASL+SVN relate
Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 07:52 -0500 schrieb Les Mikesell:
> If you are doing this in 2 directions, won't the disconnected
> repositories eventually drift out of sync as the people resolving
> conflicts make different choices - regardless of how well the VCS
> manages the details?
I guess you'r
Around about 03/06/11 23:20, Nico Kadel-Garcia typed ...
Faster than than it was for .6.16 or earlier with the Linux client? Good
Yes, tested the new TSVN this morning on our standard codebase. A full
checkout last week on the old TSVN took just shy of 15 mins. (2-3 of its
dirs. have a
On 6/5/11 10:58 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
If it doesn't take too long for a round-trip, you could ship the working
copy from site B to site A, do the commit and update, and ship it back
before doing any more work at site B.
Les, I'm loo
On 6/6/11 7:33 AM, Heinrichs, Dirk wrote:
Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 11:55 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tscharner:
I am looking for suggestions from the community as to how
best address the setup issue outlined below.
We have two sites wanting to use Subversion that are
performing parallel development
Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 11:55 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tscharner:
> > I am looking for suggestions from the community as to how
> > best address the setup issue outlined below.
> >
> > We have two sites wanting to use Subversion that are
> > performing parallel development of the same software. Du
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:57:22 +, Randolph, Christian [USA] wrote:
...
> Is there a way to setup the two subversion repositories to somehow automate
> keeping the two repositories in sync?
No (AFAIF, as usual), not out of the box.
> We are usually passing media back and forth once a week, but
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:52:38 +, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
...
> If they can't communicate electronically, you'll have to synchronize
> by physical media. Subversion is built on top of CVS paradighms, with
> a central repository. Parall, disconnected development *cannot work*
> with that model,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:55:42AM +0200, Andreas Tscharner wrote:
> People here will hate me for this, but I think you should switch to a
> DVCS (Distributed Version Control System), like Mercurial or git.
If people hate you for making this suggestion then that's their fault.
Not every tool is ma
> I am looking for suggestions from the community as to how
> best address the setup issue outlined below.
>
> We have two sites wanting to use Subversion that are
> performing parallel development of the same software. Due to
> security restrictions, the two sites are unable to
> communicate elec
My suggestion ensures that both staff will need to be corrupt in order for the
source to leak. Here, there's an armoured car company that does large cash
transfers, where every operation requires at least two staff to be present.
They say that it's so that if someone attacks one staff member, th
Hi, Richard,
Von: Richard Cavell [mailto:richardcav...@mail.com]
> I think they're going to have to communicate more often than once a week.
> Set up a trusted staff member to act as courier, who drives back and forth
> every day. If you're really paranoid, ensure that the CD is encrypted by
Just my two cents...
How secure is "secure"? Is it to stop a source code leak like Half-Life 2,
where millions of dollars in intellectual property is paraded on the Internet
and they are publicly humiliated? Or are they designing software for guided
missiles?
I think they're going to have to
16 matches
Mail list logo
